ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2018
A surgical strategy using a fusion image constructed from 11C-methionine PET, 18F-FDG-PET and MRI for glioma with no or minimum contrast enhancement.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Uptake patterns of Adult-type Non-Enhanced diffuse gliomas on [Neuroradiology · 2025Article
- The Additional Value ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Article
- Usefulness of [Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2019Article
- Current and Future Imaging Methods for Evaluating Response to Immunotherapy in Neuro-Oncology.Theranostics · 2019Review
- A Non-invasive Radiomic Method UsingFrontiers in oncology · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the distribution of 11C-methionine (MET) and F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and the hyperintense area in T2 weighted imaging (T2WI) in glioma with no or poor gadolinium enhancement in magnetic resonance imaging (GdMRI). Cases were also analyzed pathologically. We prospectively investigated 16 patients with non- or minimally enhancing (< 10% volume) glioma. All patients underwent MET-PET and FDG-PET scans preoperatively. After delineating the tumor based on MET uptake, integrated 3D images from FDG-PET and MRI (GdMRI, T2WI or FLAIR) were generated and the final resection plane was planned. This resection plane was determined intraoperatively using the navigation-guided fencepost method. The delineation obtained by MET-PET imaging was larger than that with GdMRI in all cases with an enhanced effect. In contrast, the T2WI-abnormal signal area (T2WI+) tended to be larger than the MET uptake area (MET+). Tumor resection was > 95% in the non-eloquent area in 4/5 cases (80%), whereas 10 of 11 cases (90.9%) had partial resection in the eloquent area. In a case including the language area, 92% resection was achieved based on the MET-uptake area, in contrast to T2WI-based partial resection (65%), because the T2WI+/MET- area defined the language area. Pathological findings showed that the T2WI+/MET+ area is glioma, whereas 6 of 9 T2WI+/MET- lesions included normal tissues. Tissue from T2W1+/MET+/FDG+/GdMRI+ lesions gave an accurate diagnosis of grade in six cases. Non- or minimally enhancing gliomas were classified as having a MET uptake area that totally or partially overlapped with the T2WI hyperintense area. Resection planning with or without a metabolically active area in non- or minimally enhancing gliomas may be useful for accurate diagnosis, malignancy grading, and particularly for eloquent area although further study is needed to analyze the T2WI+/MET- area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.