Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29516341›Full record

Trial reportJournal of abnormal child psychology2018

Distance-Delivered Parent Training for Childhood Disruptive Behavior (Strongest Families™): a Randomized Controlled Trial and Economic Analysis.

Janine V Olthuis, Patrick J McGrath, Charles E Cunningham, Michael H Boyle, Patricia Lingley-Pottie, Graham J Reid, Alexa Bagnell, Ellen L Lipman, Karen Turner, Penny Corkum and 3 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of abnormal child psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Parenting Programme Structure, Potential Barriers, and Facilitators: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Janine V OlthuisDepartment of Psychology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, E3B 5A3, Canada. j.olthuis@unb.ca.
Patrick J McGrathCentre for Research in Family Health, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Charles E CunninghamDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Michael H BoyleDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Patricia Lingley-PottieCentre for Research in Family Health, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Graham J ReidDepartment of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
Alexa BagnellCentre for Research in Family Health, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Ellen L LipmanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Karen TurnerCentre for Research in Family Health, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Penny CorkumDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Sherry H StewartDepartment of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Patrick BerriganResearch Methods Unit, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Kathy Sdao-JarviePeel Children's Centre, Mississauga, ON, Canada.
Dalhousie University · CAMcMaster University · CAIzaak Walton Killam Health Centre · CAChildren’s Health Research Institute · CANova Scotia Health Authority · CAUniversity of New Brunswick · CA

Funding

CIHR Operating Grant 91030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disruptive behavior disorders are prevalent in youth, yet most children with disruptive behavior do not have access to timely, effective treatment. Distance-delivered service (e.g., via telephone, Internet) can overcome several barriers to care. This study tested the effectiveness of a 12-week parent training program, Strongest Families™ Parenting the Active Child, delivered via written material, skill-based videos, and telephone coaching sessions, as compared to usual care in reducing child externalizing behavior. Participants were 172 primary caregivers of a 6- to 12-year-old (29% girls; M age = 8.5 years) recruited from community children's mental health clinics. Participants were randomized to either Strongest Families™ or usual care and completed measures of child externalizing behavior, parenting practices, parent distress, and intervention services consumed at baseline and 5-, 10-, 16-, and 22-months post-baseline. Growth curve analysis showed significant reductions in externalizing behavior in both conditions over time. Improvements were significantly greater at 10 months in the Strongest Families™ condition (d = 0.43). At 22 months, however, the differences were not significant and small in magnitude (d = -0.05). The intervention decreased inconsistent discipline significantly more than usual care. Parents in both conditions showed significant reductions in distress. We also conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis to assess the value for money of the Strongest Families™ program versus usual care. Distance parent training is a promising way to increase access to, and reduce costs associated with, mental health care for families with a child with disruptive behavior.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisOutcome Assessment, Health CareParentingAttention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior DisordersChildChild Behavior DisordersEducation, NonprofessionalFemaleHumansMaleStress, PsychologicalCost-effectivenessDisruptive behaviorDistance deliveryParent trainingTreatment accessUsual care

Identifiers

PMID29516341
OpenAlexW2793119833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.