Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29516330›Full record

ArticleThe AAPS journal2018

Application of Pharmacometric Analysis in the Design of Clinical Pharmacology Studies for Biosimilar Development.

Peijuan Zhu, Sherwin K B Sy, Andrej Skerjanec

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The AAPS journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Clinical pharmacology applications in clinical drug development and clinical care: A focus on Saudi Arabia.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2020
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Peijuan ZhuNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA. penny.zhu@novartis.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3636-7640
Sherwin K B SyNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA.
Andrej SkerjanecSandoz AG, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article provides an overview of four case studies to demonstrate the utility of pharmacometric analysis in biosimilar development to help design sensitive clinical pharmacology studies for the demonstration of biosimilarity. The two major factors that determine the sensitivity of a clinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) study to demonstrate biosimilarity are the size of the potential difference to be detected (signal) and the inter-subject variability (noise), both of which can be characterized and predicted using pharmacometric approaches. To maximize the chance to detect any potential difference between the proposed biosimilar and the reference drug, the dose selected for the clinical pharmacology study should fall on the steep part of the dose-response curve. Pharmacometric analysis can be used to characterize the dose-response relationship using PD- or PK/PD-linked models. The understanding of the PD endpoints in terms of dynamic range of the response and the location of the studied dose on the dose-response curve can provide strategic advantage in the trial design. To reduce the inter-subject variability (noise), pharmacometric analysis can help avoid high variability associated with low doses, and decrease variability by controlling certain covariates in the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Pharmacometric analysis also can help select or justify margins for the equivalence test of PD endpoints. Pharmacometric analysis will assume an ever-increasing role in the clinical development of biosimilar drugs, as it helps to ensure that sufficient sensitivity is built into the study design to detect potential PK and PD differences.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalResearch DesignBiological Variation, PopulationBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsClinical Trials as TopicDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug DevelopmentHumansPatient SelectionPharmaceutical ResearchTreatment OutcomeBiosimilar Pharmaceuticalsbiosimilarclinical pharmacology studydose-responsemodeling and simulationpharmacodynamics (PD)pharmacokinetics (PK)pharmacometric analysistrial design

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.