Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29516289›Full record

ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2018

Are Doctors the Best People to Manage Gout? Is There a Role for Nurses and Pharmacists?

Zahira Latif, Abhishek Abhishek

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zahira LatifAcademic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham City Hospital, Clinical Sciences Building, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK.
Abhishek AbhishekAcademic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham City Hospital, Clinical Sciences Building, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK. Abhishek.abhishek@nottingham.ac.uk.
Nottingham City Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo discuss alternate models of long-term gout management RECENT

findingsNurse-led care of gout appears to improve the uptake of and adherence to urate-lowering treatment in a research setting. Less impressive improvements were achieved with pharmacist-led remote management of gout; however, both strategies were more effective than usual primary care provider management of gout. Individualised education about gout, patient involvement in decision-making, and access to trained support in managing side-effects and gout flares can improve the uptake of fine and adherence to urate-lowering treatment. This may be best achieved with nurse-led care of gout. However, further research is required to evaluate if the model of nurse-led care of gout can be implemented in routine clinical practice and in different healthcare systems.

Indexed as

Professional RoleDelivery of Health CareGoutGout SuppressantsHumansMedication AdherenceNurse's RolePatient Education as TopicPatient ParticipationPharmacistsPhysician's RoleGout SuppressantsGoutNurse-led carePharmacist-led careUrate-lowering treatment

Identifiers

PMID29516289
OpenAlexW2792510430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.