ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2018
Bleeding Lesion of the Small Bowel: an Extensive Update Leaving No Stone Unturned.
Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-time multi-contrast magnetic particle imaging for the detection of gastrointestinal bleeding.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Iron Deficiency and the Small bowel.Current gastroenterology reports · 2021Review
- Inspecting the total gastrointestinal tract by consecutive bidirectional double-balloon enteroscopy in patients with suspected small bowel bleeding.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2020Article
- Causes and Clinical Characteristics of Small Bowel Bleeding in Northern Vietnam.Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2020Article
- Transcatheter arterial embolization for small-bowel bleeding: technical and clinical outcomes and risk factors for early recurrent bleeding.Annals of gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewGastrointestinal bleeding originating from the small bowel (SB) poses a challenge to the treating gastroenterologist. Once diagnosed, management is not a walk in the park either. This review intends to summarize the current state-of-the-art evidence in a complete way with special attention for vascular and ulcerative lesions, to provide the reader with a clinical guide and flow chart towards SB bleeding. RECENT
findingsAbsence of SB bleeding lesions on CE does not directly yield better prognosis; although having a lower rebleeding rate the first 2 years, rebleeding in the long term is high. Push enteroscopy can play an early role in patients with SB bleeding if suspicion of angioectasia is high, since these lesions tend to be located in the proximal SB. Endoscopic management of angioectasia is, however, difficult and shows poor results. Capsule endoscopy (CE) or device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) remain the diagnostic mainstay in SB bleeding, choosing one over the other based upon patient characteristics and expected lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.