Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29516171›Full record

ArticlePlanta2018

Tomato Ve resistance locus; defense or growth.

Ross N Nazar, Xin Xu, Hakeem Shittu, Alexander Kurosky, Jane Robb

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ross N NazarDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada. rnnazar@uoguelph.ca.
Xin XuDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Hakeem ShittuDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Alexander KuroskyDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, 77555, USA.
Jane RobbDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
University of Guelph · CAThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionVerticillium colonization does induce a cascade of defense/stress proteins but the Ve1 gene also promotes enhanced root growth, which appears to allow the plant to outgrow the pathogen and avoid symptoms associated with an exaggerated defense response. In tomato, the Ve1 gene provides resistance to the vascular pathogen, Verticillium dahliae, race 1; ve1 plants are susceptible. However, the physiological basis of the resistance is unknown. While developing alternative lines of mutant Ve1 gene transformants to address this question a striking difference was observed in transformation frequency resulting from the inefficient rooting of plantlets from ve1 callus relative to Ve1 callus. Subsequent experiments with resistant and susceptible near-isolines of the cultivar Craigella, as well as Ve1 transformants, showed that in both artificial medium and soil, root growth was significantly enhanced in the resistant cultivar. Parallel studies of Verticillium colonization indicated a significantly lower overall concentration in the resistant plant characteristic of the resistant phenotype, but an almost equal total fungal biomass in both resistant and susceptible roots. Proteomic analyses of the roots of Verticillium-infected plants revealed elevated levels of defense/stress proteins, which correlated with the fungal concentration rather than resistance. Hormone analyses demonstrated a higher cis-ABA level in the resistant isoline consistent with enhanced root growth. Taken together these studies indicate a similar fungal biomass in the roots of both isolines where the Ve1 gene also promotes root production. In the case of the Craigella/Vd1 pathosystem, this appears to allow the host to resist better by outgrowing the pathogen with less wilt rather than reliance only on partial immunity.

Indexed as

Disease ResistanceMembrane GlycoproteinsPlant DiseasesPlant ProteinsProteomicsReceptors, Cell SurfaceSolanum lycopersicumVerticilliumMembrane GlycoproteinsPlant ProteinsReceptors, Cell SurfaceVe1 protein, Lycopersicon esculentumDefense genesDevelopmentRootsSolanum lycopersicumVe resistance geneVerticillium dahliae

Identifiers

PMID29516171
OpenAlexW2794120516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.