ReviewRheumatology international2018
Can cardiovascular magnetic resonance prompt early cardiovascular/rheumatic treatment in autoimmune rheumatic diseases? Current practice and future perspectives.
Review in Rheumatology international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early Cardiac Involvement in Treatment-Naïve, Autoantibody-Seropositive Patients with Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases in the Prodromal Phase-A Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Patients With Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitides: A Systematic Review.ACR open rheumatology · 2025Review
- Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in systemic sclerosis: Heart involvement in high-resolution.Rheumatology and immunology research · 2024Article
- Cardiac magnetic resonance assessment of cardiac involvement in autoimmune diseases.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Non-invasive Imaging in Women With Heart Failure - Diagnosis and Insights Into Disease Mechanisms.Current heart failure reports · 2022Review
- Predictive Value of Echocardiographic Strain for Myocardial Fibrosis and Adverse Outcomes in Autoimmune Diseases.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Organ Manifestation and Systematic Organ Screening at the Onset of Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Intracavitary Electrocardiogram Guidance Aids Excavation of Rhythm Abnormalities in Patients with Occult Heart Disease.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2021Article
- Cardiac MRI in Autoimmune Diseases: Where Are We Now?Current cardiology reviews · 2021Review
- Effect of Biologics on Cardiovascular Inflammation: Mechanistic Insights and Risk Reduction.Journal of inflammation research · 2021Review
- Myocardial Involvement in Rheumatic Disorders.Current heart failure reports · 2020Review
- Cardiac magnetic resonance predicts ventricular arrhythmias in scleroderma: the Scleroderma Arrhythmia Clinical Utility Study (SAnCtUS).Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Identifies High-Risk Systemic Sclerosis Patients with Normal Echocardiograms and Provides Incremental Prognostic Value.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Cardiac Imaging in Liver Transplantation Candidates: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Review
- Pathophysiology and imaging of heart failure in women with autoimmune rheumatic diseases.Heart failure reviews · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Life expectancy in autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) remains lower compared to the general population, due to various comoborbidities. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) represents the main contributor to premature mortality. Conventional and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have considerably improved long-term outcomes in ARDs not only by suppressing systemic inflammation but also by lowering CVD burden. Regarding atherosclerotic disease prevention, EULAR has recommended tight disease control accompanied by regular assessment of traditional CVD risk factors and lifestyle changes. However, this approach, although rational and evidence-based, does not account for important issues such as myocardial inflammation and the long asymptomatic period that usually proceeds clinical manifestations of CVD disease in ARDs before or after the diagnosis of systemic disease. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) can offer reliable, reproducible and operator independent information regarding myocardial inflammation, ischemia and fibrosis. Some studies suggest a role for CMR in the risk stratification of ARDs and demonstrate that oedema/fibrosis visualisation with CMR may have the potential to inform cardiac and rheumatic treatment modification in ARDs with or without abnormal routine cardiac evaluation. In this review, we discuss how CMR findings could influence anti-rheumatic treatment decisions targeting optimal control of both systemic and myocardial inflammation irrespective of clinical manifestations of cardiac disease. CMR can provide a different approach that is very promising for risk stratification and treatment modification; however, further studies are needed before the inclusion of CMR in the routine evaluation and treatment of patients with ARDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.