Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29516105›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2018

CT colonography: over two decades from discovery to practice.

Perry J Pickhardt, Judy Yee, C Daniel Johnson

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The CT colonography radiology and data system: history, updates, and future directions.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Computed tomography colonography and radiation risk: How low can we go?World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Perry J PickhardtDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, E3/311 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53792-3252, USA. ppickhardt2@uwhealth.org.
Judy YeeDepartment of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 210 East 111 Street, Bronx, NY, 10467, USA.
C Daniel JohnsonDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 13400 E Shea Blvd, Scottsdale, AZ, 85259-5452, USA.

Funding

(PQ6) Radiogenomics of colorectal polyps to assess benign proliferative vs. premalignant states.R01CA220004 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI GRADY, WILLIAM MALLORY, HALBERG, RICHARD BROTT · 2017 to 2021
$3.2M
Virtual Colonoscopy and Colorectal Cancer ScreeningR01CA144835 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI PICKHARDT, PERRY, SMITH, MAUREEN A · 2010 to 2013
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA144835NCI NIH HHS R01 CA220004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the introduction of CT colonography (CTC) in the mid-1990s, there have been continuous advancements in the examination technique and advanced visualization software for interpretation. This review will cover the origins of CTC as a natural extension of abdominal CT imaging, and discuss the evolution of CTC through the subsequent clinical phases of feasibility, validation, and implementation.

Indexed as

Colonography, Computed TomographicColorectal NeoplasmsHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedSoftwareColorectal cancerCT colonographyScreeningVirtual colonoscopy

Identifiers

PMID29516105
PMCPMC5861031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.