Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29515882›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2018

How maternal investment varies with environmental factors and the age and physiological state of wild tsetse

John W Hargrove, M Odwell Muzari, Sinead English

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Modeling framework to demonstrate elimination of a vector population: Tsetse elimination in Chad.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Phenotypic divergence ofEcology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

John W HargroveCentre of Excellence in Epidemiological Modelling and Analysis (SACEMA), Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-0346-5260
M Odwell MuzariTropical Public Health Services, Queensland Health, Cairns, Australia.
Sinead EnglishBehavioural Ecology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P005888/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P006159/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theory suggests females should optimize resource allocation across reproductive bouts to maximize lifetime reproduction, balancing current and future reproductive efforts according to physiological state and projected survival and reproduction. Tests of these ideas focus on long-lived vertebrates: few measure age-related reproductive output in iteroparous invertebrates, or partition reserves between those allocated to offspring versus mothers. We investigated how maternal age, and environmental and physiological factors influence reproductive investment in wild tsetse,

Indexed as

Glossina pallidipesmaternal effectsnutritionpregnancytrade-offstsetse

Identifiers

PMID29515882
PMCPMC5830771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.