Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29515850›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2018

External immunity in ant societies: sociality and colony size do not predict investment in antimicrobials.

Clint A Penick, Omar Halawani, Bria Pearson, Stephanie Mathews, Margarita M López-Uribe, Robert R Dunn, Adrian A Smith

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Clint A PenickThe Biomimicry Center, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5368-507X
Omar HalawaniResearch & Collections, North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, Raleigh, NC 27601, USA.
Bria PearsonResearch & Collections, North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, Raleigh, NC 27601, USA.
Stephanie MathewsBiological Sciences, Campbell University, Buies Creek, NC 27506, USA.
Margarita M López-UribeDepartment of Entomology, Center for Pollinator Research, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Robert R DunnDepartment of Applied Ecology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Adrian A SmithResearch & Collections, North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, Raleigh, NC 27601, USA.
North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences · USArizona State University · USCampbell University · USPennsylvania State University · USUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social insects live in dense groups with a high probability of disease transmission and have therefore faced strong pressures to develop defences against pathogens. For this reason, social insects have been hypothesized to invest in antimicrobial secretions as a mechanism of external immunity to prevent the spread of disease. However, empirical studies linking the evolution of sociality with increased investment in antimicrobials have been relatively few. Here we quantify the strength of antimicrobial secretions among 20 ant species that cover a broad spectrum of ant diversity and colony sizes. We extracted external compounds from ant workers to test whether they inhibited the growth of the bacterium

Indexed as

antibioticsantimicrobial secretionsantsentomopathogenssocial immunitysocial insects

Identifiers

PMID29515850
PMCPMC5830739
OpenAlexW2787053847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.