Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29515808›Full record

ReviewJournal of intensive care2018

Seizure prophylaxis in the neuroscience intensive care unit.

Sushma Yerram, Nakul Katyal, Keerthivaas Premkumar, Premkumar Nattanmai, Christopher R Newey

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of intensive care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Deep Sedation in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients.Korean journal of neurotrauma · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sushma Yerram1Department of Neurology, University of Missouri, 5 Hospital Drive, CE 540, Columbia, MO 65211 USA.
Nakul Katyal1Department of Neurology, University of Missouri, 5 Hospital Drive, CE 540, Columbia, MO 65211 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0249-1707
Keerthivaas Premkumar2Department of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 USA.
Premkumar Nattanmai1Department of Neurology, University of Missouri, 5 Hospital Drive, CE 540, Columbia, MO 65211 USA.
Christopher R Newey1Department of Neurology, University of Missouri, 5 Hospital Drive, CE 540, Columbia, MO 65211 USA.
University of Missouri Hospital · USCleveland Clinic · USUniversity of Missouri · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeizures are a considerable complication in critically ill patients. Their incidence is significantly high in neurosciences intensive care unit patients. Seizure prophylaxis with anti-epileptic drugs is a common practice in neurosciences intensive care unit. However, its utility in patients without clinical seizure, with an underlying neurological injury, is somewhat controversial. BODY: In this article, we have reviewed the evidence for seizure prophylaxis in commonly encountered neurological conditions in neurosciences intensive care unit and discussed the possible prognostic role of continuous electroencephalography monitoring in detecting early seizures in critically ill patients.

conclusionBased on the current evidence and guidelines, we have proposed a presumptive protocol for seizure prophylaxis in neurosciences intensive care unit. Patients with severe traumatic brain injury and possible subarachnoid hemorrhage seem to benefit with a short course of anti-epileptic drug. In patients with other neurological illnesses, the use of continuous electroencephalography would make sense rather than indiscriminately administering anti-epileptic drug.

Indexed as

Anti-epileptic drugsContinuous electroencephalographyCritically ill patientsSeizure prophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID29515808
PMCPMC5836415
OpenAlexW2800889128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.