Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29515771›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2018

Proteomic analyses identify prognostic biomarkers for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Dingyuan Hu, Daniel Ansari, Krzysztof Pawłowski, Qimin Zhou, Agata Sasor, Charlotte Welinder, Theresa Kristl, Monika Bauden, Melinda Rezeli, Yi Jiang and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Role of MMP8 in Cancer: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Cadherin 17 and digestive cancers: from diagnostic to therapeutic opportunities.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. E-Cadherin Is a Structuring Component of Invadopodia in Pancreatic Cancer.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Susceptibility of cytoskeletal-associated proteins for tumor progression.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Dingyuan HuLund University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund (Surgery), Lund, Sweden.
Daniel AnsariLund University, Skane University Hospital, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund (Surgery), Lund, Sweden.
Krzysztof PawłowskiDepartment of Experimental Design and Bioinformatics, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
Qimin ZhouLund University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund (Surgery), Lund, Sweden.
Agata SasorDepartment of Pathology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Charlotte WelinderLund University, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Oncology and Pathology, Lund, Sweden.
Theresa KristlLund University, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Oncology and Pathology, Lund, Sweden.
Monika BaudenLund University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund (Surgery), Lund, Sweden.
Melinda RezeliDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Clinical Protein Science and Imaging, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Yi JiangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
György Marko-VargaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Clinical Protein Science and Imaging, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Roland AnderssonLund University, Skane University Hospital, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund (Surgery), Lund, Sweden.
Lund University · SESkåne University Hospital · SEWenzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly aggressive malignancy. Here we show that shotgun and targeted protein sequencing can be used to identify potential prognostic biomarkers in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens from 9 patients with PDAC with "short" survival (<12 months) and 10 patients with "long" survival (>45 months) undergoing surgical resection. A total of 24 and 147 proteins were significantly upregulated [fold change ≥2 or ≤0.5 and P<0.05; or different detection frequencies (≥5 samples)] in patients with "short" survival (including GLUT1) and "long" survival (including C9orf64, FAM96A, CDH1 and CDH17), respectively. STRING analysis of these proteins indicated a tight protein-protein interaction network centered on TP53. Ingenuity pathway analysis linked proteins representing "activated stroma factors" and "basal tumor factors" to poor prognosis of PDAC. It also highlighted TCF1 and CTNNB1 as possible upstream regulators. Further parallel reaction monitoring verified that seven proteins were upregulated in patients with "short" survival (MMP9, CLIC3, MMP8, PRTN3, P4HA2, THBS1 and FN1), while 18 proteins were upregulated in patients with "long" survival, including EPCAM, LGALS4, VIL1, CLCA1 and TPPP3. Thus, we verified 25 protein biomarker candidates for PDAC prognosis at the tissue level. Furthermore, an activated stroma status and protein-protein interactions with TP53 might be linked to poor prognosis of PDAC.

Indexed as

biomarkerpancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaproteomesurvivaltumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID29515771
PMCPMC5839402
OpenAlexW2782043374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.