ArticleFrontiers in plant science2018
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbial biocontrol agents and the rhizosphere microbiome: integrating ecological function and climate resilience in sustainable agriculture.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Biocontrol Potential and Growth-Promoting Effects of Freshwater Trichoderma Strains against Plant Pathogenic Fungi in Red Pepper.The plant pathology journal · 2025Article
- Nitrogen Immobilization by Wood Fiber Substrates Strongly Affects the Photosynthetic Performance of Lettuce.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Identification and application of an endophytic fungusFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Review
- Agro-industrial-residues as potting media: physicochemical and biological characters and their influence on plant growth.Biomass conversion and biorefinery · 2021Review
- Microbial Consortia for Effective Biocontrol of Root and Foliar Diseases in Tomato.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Biochar-Enhanced Resistance toFrontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peat based growing media are not ecologically sustainable and often fail to support biological control. Miscanthus straw was (1) tested to partially replace peat; and (2) pre-colonized with a
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.