Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29515612›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2018

An Initiative for the Study and Use of Genetic Diversity of Domesticated Plants and Their Wild Relatives.

Alicia Mastretta-Yanes, Francisca Acevedo Gasman, Caroline Burgeff, Margarita Cano Ramírez, Daniel Piñero, José Sarukhán

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. EST-SNP Study ofGenes · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alicia Mastretta-YanesCONACYT - Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, Mexico City, Mexico.
Francisca Acevedo GasmanComisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, Mexico City, Mexico.
Caroline BurgeffComisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, Mexico City, Mexico.
Margarita Cano RamírezComisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, Mexico City, Mexico.
Daniel PiñeroInstituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
José SarukhánInstituto de Ecología, Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Domestication has been influenced by formal plant breeding since the onset of intensive agriculture and the Green Revolution. Despite providing food security for some regions, intensive agriculture has had substantial detrimental consequences for the environment and does not fulfill smallholder's needs under most developing countries conditions. Therefore, it is necessary to look for alternative plant production techniques, effective for each environmental, socio-cultural, and economic conditions. This is particularly relevant for countries that are megadiverse and major centers of plant domestication and diversification. In this white paper, a Mexico-centered initiative is proposed, with two main objectives: (1) to study, understand, conserve, and sustainably use the genetic diversity of domesticated plants and their wild relatives, as well as the ongoing evolutionary processes that generate and maintain it; and (2) to strengthen food and forestry production in a socially fair and environmentally friendly way. To fulfill these objectives, the initiative focuses on the source of variability available for domestication (

Indexed as

agroecologyconservation geneticsfood securityfood sovereigntyforestryMexicomilpa

Identifiers

PMID29515612
PMCPMC5826304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.