ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2018
Analysis of CRISPR-Cas System in
Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genome editing‑based strategies to combat geminiviruses: CRISPR/Cas9 and emerging high‑fidelity tools.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- The engineering toolbox of Parageobacillus thermoglucosidasius.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Comparative genome analysis of 15 Streptococcus thermophilus strains isolated from Turkish traditional yogurt.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2025Article
- Unveiling the Probiotic Potential ofMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Bacteriophage-host interactions in Streptococcus thermophilus and their impact on co-evolutionary processes.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2023Review
- Bio-informatic analysis of CRISPR protospacer adjacent motifs (PAMs) in T4 genome.BMC genomic data · 2022Article
- Novel CRISPR-Cas Systems: An Updated Review of the Current Achievements, Applications, and Future Research Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Ectopic Spacer Acquisition inMicroorganisms · 2021Article
- Evaluation of CRISPR Diversity in the Human Skin Microbiome for Personal Identification.mSystems · 2021Article
- 5' modifications to CRISPR-Cas9 gRNA can change the dynamics and size of R-loops and inhibit DNA cleavage.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- Genome Analysis and Physiological Characterization of FourFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Comparative Genomics ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- Efficient Genome Editing ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
- Study the Features of 57 Confirmed CRISPR Loci in 38 Strains ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CRISPR-Cas (Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-CRISPR associated proteins) loci, which provide a specific immunity against exogenous elements, are hypervariable among distinct prokaryotes. Based on previous researches, this review focuses on concluding systematical genome editing protocols in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.