Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29515372›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2018

Glial Tissue Mechanics and Mechanosensing by Glial Cells.

Katarzyna Pogoda, Paul A Janmey

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Nanomechanical Hallmarks ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Surface Tension and Neuronal Sorting in Magnetically Engineered Brain-Like Tissue.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. ECM Mechanoregulation in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Stiffness Sensing by Cells.Physiological reviews · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katarzyna PogodaDepartment of Physiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Paul A JanmeyDepartment of Physiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the mechanical behavior of human brain is critical to interpret the role of physical stimuli in both normal and pathological processes that occur in CNS tissue, such as development, inflammation, neurodegeneration, aging, and most common brain tumors. Despite clear evidence that mechanical cues influence both normal and transformed brain tissue activity as well as normal and transformed brain cell behavior, little is known about the links between mechanical signals and their biochemical and medical consequences. A multi-level approach from whole organ rheology to single cell mechanics is needed to understand the physical aspects of human brain function and its pathologies. This review summarizes the latest achievements in the field.

Indexed as

brain-mimicking ECMsbrain tissue rheologymechanical properties of brain tumorsmechanosensingnormal and transformed glial cells

Identifiers

PMID29515372
PMCPMC5826335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.