Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29515284›Full record

ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2017

The effect of hypofractionated radiation and magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia on tumor immunogenicity and overall treatment response.

P Jack Hoopes, Robert J Wagner, Ailin Song, Bjorn Osterberg, David J Gladstone, Alicea A Bursey, Steven N Fiering, Andrew J Giustini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Enhancing the abscopal effect of radiation and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies with magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia in a model of metastatic breast cancer.International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

P Jack HoopesGeisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, 1 Rope Ferry Road, Hanover, NH, USA 03755.
Robert J WagnerGeisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, 1 Rope Ferry Road, Hanover, NH, USA 03755.
Ailin SongGeisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, 1 Rope Ferry Road, Hanover, NH, USA 03755.
Bjorn OsterbergGeisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, 1 Rope Ferry Road, Hanover, NH, USA 03755.
David J GladstoneGeisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, 1 Rope Ferry Road, Hanover, NH, USA 03755.
Alicea A BurseyGeisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, 1 Rope Ferry Road, Hanover, NH, USA 03755.
Steven N FieringGeisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, 1 Rope Ferry Road, Hanover, NH, USA 03755.
Andrew J GiustiniStanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA.
Dartmouth College · USStanford University · US

Funding

Toxicology, Pathology and Biodistribution Core (TPB Core)U54CA151662 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI DEMIDENKO, EUGENE · 2010 to 2014
$11.6M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA151662
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is now known that many tumors develop molecular signals (immune checkpoint modulators) that inhibit an effective tumor immune response. New information also suggest that even well-known cancer treatment modalities such as radiation and hyperthermia generate potentially beneficial immune responses that have been blocked or mitigated by such immune checkpoints, or similar molecules. The cancer therapy challenge is to; a) identify these treatment-based immune signals (proteins, antigens, etc.); b) the treatment doses or regimens that produce them; and c) the mechanisms that block or have the potential to promote them. The goal of this preliminary study, using the B6 mouse - B16 tumor model, clinically relevant radiation doses and fractionation schemes (including those used clinically in hypofractionated radiation therapy), magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia (mNPH) and sophisticated protein, immune and tumor growth analysis techniques and modulators, is to determine the effect of specific radiation or hyperthermia alone and combined on overall treatment efficacy and immunologic response mechanisms. Preliminary analysis suggests that radiation dose (10 Gy vs. 2 Gy) significantly alters the mechanism of cell death (apoptosis vs. mitosis vs. necrosis) and the resulting immunogenicity. Our hypothesis and data suggest this difference is protein/antigen and immune recognition-based. Similarly, our evidence suggest that radiation doses larger than the conventional 2 Gy dose and specific hyperthermia doses and techniques (including mNP hyperthermia treatment) can be immunologically different, and potentially superior to, the radiation and heat therapy regimens that are typically used in research and clinical practice.

Indexed as

abscopal effectcancer therapyhyperthermiahypo-fractionated radiationmagnetic nanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID29515284
PMCPMC5837053
OpenAlexW2590009033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.