Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29515256›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2018

Expression of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) and hENT1 predicts survival in pancreatic cancer.

N O Elander, K Aughton, P Ghaneh, J P Neoptolemos, D H Palmer, T F Cox, F Campbell, E Costello, C M Halloran, J R Mackey and 18 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Chemoresistance in Pancreatic Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 12 institutions in 7 countries.

N O ElanderFrom the Cancer Research U.K. Liverpool Cancer Trials Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
K AughtonFrom the Cancer Research U.K. Liverpool Cancer Trials Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
P GhanehFrom the Cancer Research U.K. Liverpool Cancer Trials Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
J P NeoptolemosThe Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
D H PalmerFrom the Cancer Research U.K. Liverpool Cancer Trials Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
T F CoxFrom the Cancer Research U.K. Liverpool Cancer Trials Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
F CampbellFrom the Cancer Research U.K. Liverpool Cancer Trials Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
E CostelloFrom the Cancer Research U.K. Liverpool Cancer Trials Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
C M HalloranFrom the Cancer Research U.K. Liverpool Cancer Trials Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
J R MackeyCross Cancer Institute and University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada.
A G ScarfeCross Cancer Institute and University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada.
J W ValleUniversity of Manchester/The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
A C McDonaldThe Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
R CarterGlasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
N C TebbuttAustin Health, Melbourne, Australia.
D GoldsteinPrince of Wales hospital and Clinical School University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia.
J ShannonNepean Cancer Centre and University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
C DervenisThe Agia Olga Hospital, Athens, Greece.
B GlimeliusDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
M DeakinUniversity Hospital, North Staffordshire, UK.
R M CharnleyFreeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Alan AnthoneySt James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
M M LerchDepartment of Medicine A, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
J MayerleDepartment of Medicine II, University Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
A OláhThe Petz Aladar Hospital, Gyor, Hungary.
M W BüchlerThe Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
W GreenhalfFrom the Cancer Research U.K. Liverpool Cancer Trials Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. greenhaf@liv.ac.uk.
European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer
University of Liverpool · GBBeatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre · GBThe University of Sydney · AUUniversitätsmedizin Greifswald · DEUniversity of Alberta · CAUppsala University · SEGlasgow Royal Infirmary · GBHeidelberg University · DEPetz Aladár Megyei Oktató Kórház · HURoyal Stoke University Hospital · GBSt James's University Hospital · GBUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

Cancer Research UK 11883Cancer Research UK 15957Cancer Research UK 16186Cancer Research UK 16791Cancer Research UK 16812Cancer Research UK 17680Cancer Research UK 8968Cancer Research UK C245/A 15957Cancer Research UK C245/A82390Cancer Research UK C245/A9855Cancer Research UK C35628/A11588Department of Health 08/29/02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) tumour expression may provide added value to human equilibrative nucleoside transporter-1 (hENT1) tumour expression in predicting survival following pyrimidine-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

methodsDPD and hENT1 immunohistochemistry and scoring was completed on tumour cores from 238 patients with pancreatic cancer in the ESPAC-3(v2) trial, randomised to either postoperative gemcitabine or 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (5FU/FA).

resultsDPD tumour expression was associated with reduced overall survival (hazard ratio, HR = 1.73 [95% confidence interval, CI = 1.21-2.49], p = 0.003). This was significant in the 5FU/FA arm (HR = 2.07 [95% CI = 1.22-3.53], p = 0.007), but not in the gemcitabine arm (HR = 1.47 [0.91-3.37], p = 0.119). High hENT1 tumour expression was associated with increased survival in gemcitabine treated (HR = 0.56 [0.38-0.82], p = 0.003) but not in 5FU/FA treated patients (HR = 1.19 [0.80-1.78], p = 0.390). In patients with low hENT1 tumour expression, high DPD tumour expression was associated with a worse median [95% CI] survival in the 5FU/FA arm (9.7 [5.3-30.4] vs 29.2 [19.5-41.9] months, p = 0.002) but not in the gemcitabine arm (14.0 [9.1-15.7] vs. 18.0 [7.6-15.3] months, p = 1.000). The interaction of treatment arm and DPD expression was not significant (p = 0.303), but the interaction of treatment arm and hENT1 expression was (p = 0.009).

conclusionDPD tumour expression was a negative prognostic biomarker. Together with tumour expression of hENT1, DPD tumour expression defined patient subgroups that might benefit from either postoperative 5FU/FA or gemcitabine.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalDeoxycytidineDihydrouracil Dehydrogenase (NADP)Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporter 1FemaleFluorouracilGemcitabineHumansImmunohistochemistryLeucovorinMaleBiomarkers, TumorDeoxycytidineDihydrouracil Dehydrogenase (NADP)Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporter 1FluorouracilGemcitabineLeucovorinSLC29A1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID29515256
PMCPMC5931115
OpenAlexW2783352225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.