Observational studySpinal cord2018
Impact of orthotic therapy for improving activities of daily living in individuals with spinal cord injury: a retrospective cohort study.
Observational study in Spinal cord, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in the clinical application of orthotic devices for stroke and spinal cord injury since 2013.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Review
- The Effects of Lower Limb Orthoses on Health Aspects of the Spinal Cord Injury Patients: A Systematic Review Using International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) as a Reference Framework.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designRetrospective cohort study.
objectiveTo determine the impact of leg orthotic therapy for improving activities of daily living after spinal cord injury.
settingParticipating acute care and rehabilitation hospitals across Japan.
methodsWe retrospectively identified individuals with spinal cord injury admitted to eight participating hospitals in 2015-2016 from the Japan Rehabilitation Database. Data for 293 individuals were analyzed. Propensity score analysis by inverse probability weighting (IPW) was applied to adjust for potential bias and create two comparable groups. Outcomes were compared between the leg orthotic group and the non-leg orthotic group, using IPW. The primary outcome was motor Functional Independence Measure
resultsLeg orthoses were prescribed for 26% of the 293 individuals. Those prescribed leg orthoses had significantly higher motor FIM effectiveness scores than those who were not, before and after IPW (motor FIM effectiveness: 0.54 vs. 0.35, p < 0.01 and 0.45 vs. 0.36, p = 0.02). Discharge motor FIM was significantly higher in individuals who were prescribed leg orthoses than in those who were not, before and after IPW (discharge motor FIM: 64.5 vs. 52.2, p < 0.01 and 58.9 vs. 53.5, p = 0.02).
conclusionsLeg orthoses may improve activities of daily living in individuals with spinal cord injury after the acute phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.