ArticleSpinal cord2018
Positive airway pressure therapy for sleep-disordered breathing confers short-term benefits to patients with spinal cord injury despite widely ranging patterns of use.
Article in Spinal cord, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Positive airway pressure for sleep-disordered breathing in acute quadriplegia: a randomised controlled trial.Thorax · 2019Trial
- Sleep apnea in individuals with spinal cord injury.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025Article
- Mild intermittent hypoxia may improve autonomic dysfunction in persons living with spinal cord injury: a preliminary snapshot.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- The Role of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure Identified in Critical Care, Inpatient, and Outpatient Settings.Sleep medicine clinics · 2024Review
- Adherence to continuous positive airway pressure therapy in patients with spinal cord injury and obstructive sleep apnea: trajectories and predictors.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2024Article
- Observational
- Review
- Impact Of Spinal Cord Injury On Sleep: Current Perspectives.Nature and science of sleep · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designProspective, cohort study.
objectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness of bi-level positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy and the patterns of use for sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI).
settingAcademic tertiary care center, USA.
methodsOverall, 91 adults with C1-T6 SCI for ≥3 months were recruited and 74 remained in the study to be evaluated for SDB and follow-up. Individuals with SDB but no nocturnal hypercapnia (NH) were prescribed auto-titrating PAP. Those with NH were prescribed PAP with volume-assured pressure support. Device downloads and overnight transcutaneous capnography were performed at 3, 6, and 12 months to quantify PAP use and effectiveness. Participants kept daily event logs, and quality of life (QOL) questionnaires were performed after 3, 6, and 12 months.
resultsOverall, 45% of 91 participants completed the study. There was great diversity among SCI patients in PAP utilization; after 3 months, 37.8% of participants used PAP for ≥70% nights and ≥240 min per night, whereas 42.2% seldom used PAP and 20% used PAP sporadically or for short periods. PAP therapy was effective in improving OSA in 89% and nocturnal hypercapnia in 77%. Higher PAP pressures predicted higher levels of device use. There were marked reductions in symptoms of autonomic dysreflexia (AD) and orthostatic hypotension as well as some improved indices of QOL.
conclusionsDespite widely diverse patterns of use, PAP therapy may have short-term benefits with regard to QOL and reducing episodes of dizziness and autonomic dysreflexia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.