ArticleScientific reports2018
Mycobacterium ahvazicum sp. nov., the nineteenth species of the Mycobacterium simiae complex.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interactions at theMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2026Review
- Exploration of factors associated with turnaround time when evaluating non-tuberculous mycobacterium cultures.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Mycobacterium hainanense sp. nov. represents an emerging nontuberculous Mycobacterium associated with chronic pulmonary disease.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Biochip-Based Identification of Mycobacterial Species in Russia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- The Intriguing Pattern of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria in Bulgaria and Description ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Genomic diversity and clinical relevance ofERJ open research · 2024Article
- Role of Williamsia and Segniliparus in human infections with the approach taxonomy, cultivation, and identification methods.Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Four slowly growing mycobacteria isolates were isolated from the respiratory tract and soft tissue biopsies collected in four unrelated patients in Iran. Conventional phenotypic tests indicated that these four isolates were identical to Mycobacterium lentiflavum while 16S rRNA gene sequencing yielded a unique sequence separated from that of M. lentiflavum. One representative strain AFP-003
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.