Observational studyJournal of clinical microbiology2018
Rapid Molecular Detection of Gastrointestinal Pathogens and Its Role in Antimicrobial Stewardship.
Observational study in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of a Rapid Multiplex Gastrointestinal Panel with Standard Laboratory Testing in the Management of Children with Hematochezia in a Pediatric Emergency Department: Randomized Controlled Trial.Microbiology spectrum · 2023Trial
- Impact of FilmArray Gastrointestinal Panel Compared to Standard-of-Care Diagnostic Tests in Clinical Practice of Acute Gastroenteritis in an HIV Reference Center with Limited Resources.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- PCR-Based Versus Conventional Stool Testing in Hospitalized Patients with Diarrhea: Diagnostic Yield, Clinical Impact, and Stewardship Implications.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Associations Between BioFire FilmArray Gastrointestinal Panel Results and Clinical Outcomes in Infectious Gastroenteritis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Panels for Gastrointestinal Infections: Current Evidence, Regulatory Hurdles, and the Way Forward.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Multicenter evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx Gastrointestinal Panel 2, a multiplex PCR platform for the diagnosis of acute gastroenteritis.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2025Article
- Clinical Impact of Stool Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Testing in Hospitalized Patients with Acute Diarrhea: A Retrospective Observational Study.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Prevalence of pathogens associated with neonatal gastrointestinal infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Gut pathogens · 2025Review
- The Prognostic Role of Serum Procalcitonin for Adult Patients with Acute Diarrhea in the Emergency Department.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- State of the Art of Antimicrobial and Diagnostic Stewardship in Pediatric Setting.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Emergency Care for Refugee Patients at Suceava Hospital, Romania: Challenges and Insights from the First Year of the Russian-Ukrainian Conflict.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Exploring the Utility of Multiplex Infectious Disease Panel Testing for Diagnosis of Infection in Different Body Sites: A Joint Report of the Association for Molecular Pathology, American Society for Microbiology, Infectious Diseases Society of America, and Pan American Society for Clinical Virology.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2023Review
- Summer diarrhea in children: a monocentric French epidemiological observational study.Scientific reports · 2023Observational
- The Impact of a Positive BiofireDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Mapping of etiologies of computed tomography-proven acute colitis: a prospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Genomic Screening of Antimicrobial Resistance Markers in UK and USAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2022Article
- A randomized control trial of a multiplex gastrointestinal PCR panel versus usual testing to assess antibiotics use for patients with infectious diarrhea in the emergency department.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2022Article
- Verification of analytical bacterial spectrum of QIAstat-Dx® GI V2 and Novodiag® Bacterial GE+ V2-0 diagnostic panels.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2021Article
- Syndromic Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction (mPCR) Testing and Antimicrobial Stewardship: Current Practice and Future Directions.Current infectious disease reports · 2021Review
- Appropriate Use and Future Directions of Molecular Diagnostic Testing.Current infectious disease reports · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to detect the etiological agents of acute diarrhea by a molecular gastrointestinal pathogen test (MGPT) and to assess the impact of MGPT on antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP). This is a prospective observational study and was conducted between 1 January 2015 and 30 June 2017. We included consequent patients who had acute diarrhea. At the end of 2015, we implemented ASP in acute diarrhea cases and compared the outcomes in the pre-ASP and post-ASP periods. An FDA-cleared multiplexed gastrointestinal PCR panel system, the BioFire FilmArray (Idaho Technology, Salt Lake City, UT), which detects 20 pathogens in stool, was used. In 499 out of 699 patients (71%), at least one pathogen was detected. Among 314 adults with positive MGPT, 101 (32%) enteropathogenic
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.