Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29514689›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Patient-identified information and communication needs in the context of major trauma.

Sandra Braaf, Shanthi Ameratunga, Andrew Nunn, Nicola Christie, Warwick Teague, Rodney Judson, Belinda J Gabbe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A review on factors related to patient comfort experience in hospitals.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Qualitative Study to Understand the Impact of Caring for Traumatic Injury Survivors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Patient Compliance: Fact or Fiction?Innovations in pharmacy · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sandra BraafDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, The Alfred Centre, Commercial Rd, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia. sandra.braaf@monash.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7942-0179
Shanthi AmeratungaSchool of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Andrew NunnVictorian Spinal Cord Service, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Nicola ChristieDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, University College of London, London, UK.
Warwick TeagueTrauma Service, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Rodney JudsonTrauma Service, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Belinda J GabbeDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, The Alfred Centre, Commercial Rd, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council GNT1061786
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNavigating complex health care systems during the multiple phases of recovery following major trauma entails many challenges for injured patients. Patients' experiences communicating with health professionals are of particular importance in this context. The aim of this study was to explore seriously injured patients' perceptions of communication with and information provided by health professionals in their first 3-years following injury.

methodsA qualitative study designed was used, nested within a population-based longitudinal cohort study. Semi-structured telephone interviews were undertaken with 65 major trauma patients, aged 17 years and older at the time of injury, identified through purposive sampling from the Victorian State Trauma Registry. A detailed thematic analysis was undertaken using a framework approach.

resultsMany seriously injured patients faced barriers to communication with health professionals in the hospital, rehabilitation and in the community settings. Key themes related to limited contact with health professionals, insufficient information provision, and challenges with information coordination. Communication difficulties were particularly apparent when many health professionals were involved in patient care, or when patients transitioned from hospital to rehabilitation or to the community. Difficulties in patient-health professional engagement compromised communication and exchange of information particularly at transitions of care, e.g., discharge from hospital. Conversely, positive attributes displayed by health professionals such as active discussion, clear language, listening and an empathetic manner, all facilitated effective communication. Most patients preferred communication consistent with patient-centred approaches, and the use of multiple modes to communicate information.

conclusionsThe communication and information needs of seriously injured patients were inconsistently met over the course of their recovery continuum. To assist patients along their recovery trajectories, patient-centred communication approaches and considerations for environmental and patients' health literacy are recommended. Additionally, assistance with information coordination and comprehensive multimodal information provision should be available for injured patients.

Indexed as

CommunicationNeeds AssessmentPhysician-Patient RelationsAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchTrauma Severity IndicesWounds and InjuriesYoung AdultCommunicationDisabilityHealth literacyInjuryInterviewRecoveryTrauma

Identifiers

PMID29514689
PMCPMC5842544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.