ReviewBMC palliative care2018
Aligning policy objectives and payment design in palliative care.
Review in BMC palliative care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Population Preferences for Treatment in Life-Limiting Illness: Valuing the Way Time Is Spent at the End of Life.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2025Article
- The compassionate communities connectors program: effect on healthcare usage.Palliative care and social practice · 2023Article
- NDIS Participants with Psychosocial Disabilities and Life-Limiting Diagnoses: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Palliative and End-of-Life Care Service Models: To What Extent Are Consumer Perspectives Considered?Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Practices, challenges, and opportunities when addressing the palliative care needs of people living with dementia: Specialty memory care provider perspectives.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.) · 2021Article
- Quality indicators for the evaluation of end-of-life care in Germany - a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of statutory health insurance data.BMC palliative care · 2020Article
- Introducing the trajectory Touchpoint technique: a systematic methodology for capturing the service experiences of palliative care patients and their families.BMC palliative care · 2020Article
- Palliative care training addressed to hospital healthcare professionals by palliative care specialists: a mixed-method evaluation.BMC palliative care · 2019Article
- End-of-life care in rural general practice: how best to support commitment and meet challenges?BMC palliative care · 2019Article
- A pilot study on patient-related costs and factors associated with the cost of specialist palliative care in the hospital: first steps towards a patient classification system in Germany.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPayment models for palliative care vary across nations, with few adopting contemporary payments designs that apply to other parts of the health system.
aimTo propose optimal payment arrangements for palliative care. APPROACH: Review of relevant literature on funding mechanisms in health care generally and palliative care in particular.
resultsPayment models for palliative care should move toward activity-based funding using an agreed classification, be uncapped funding with performance monitoring, and make explicit use of performance metrics and reporting.
conclusionsIf palliative care is to become a universally accessible service, new approaches to funding, based on the experience of funding reforms in other parts of the health system, need to be adopted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.