Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29514626›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018

An information-theoretic approach to the modeling and analysis of whole-genome bisulfite sequencing data.

Garrett Jenkinson, Jordi Abante, Andrew P Feinberg, John Goutsias

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Garrett JenkinsonWhitaker Biomedical Engineering Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jordi AbanteWhitaker Biomedical Engineering Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Andrew P FeinbergCenter for Epigenetics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
John GoutsiasWhitaker Biomedical Engineering Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. goutsias@jhu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0192-3857

Funding

MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY OF WILMS TUMOR RELATED GENES 11PR01CA054358 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ANDREW P. FEINBERG · 1991 to 2026
$5.5M
Integration of Genomics and the EnvironmentRM1HG008529 · NHGRI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FEINBERG, ANDREW P., THREADGILL, DAVID W. · 2016 to 2020
$5.3M
BWS and Embryonal Tumor Suppressor Genes on 11p15R37CA054358 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FEINBERG, ANDREW P. · 2001 to 2009
$4.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA054358NCI NIH HHS R37 CA054358NHGRI NIH HHS RM1 HG008529NIH HHS CA054358NIH HHS HG008529
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDNA methylation is a stable form of epigenetic memory used by cells to control gene expression. Whole genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) has emerged as a gold-standard experimental technique for studying DNA methylation by producing high resolution genome-wide methylation profiles. Statistical modeling and analysis is employed to computationally extract and quantify information from these profiles in an effort to identify regions of the genome that demonstrate crucial or aberrant epigenetic behavior. However, the performance of most currently available methods for methylation analysis is hampered by their inability to directly account for statistical dependencies between neighboring methylation sites, thus ignoring significant information available in WGBS reads.

resultsWe present a powerful information-theoretic approach for genome-wide modeling and analysis of WGBS data based on the 1D Ising model of statistical physics. This approach takes into account correlations in methylation by utilizing a joint probability model that encapsulates all information available in WGBS methylation reads and produces accurate results even when applied on single WGBS samples with low coverage. Using the Shannon entropy, our approach provides a rigorous quantification of methylation stochasticity in individual WGBS samples genome-wide. Furthermore, it utilizes the Jensen-Shannon distance to evaluate differences in methylation distributions between a test and a reference sample. Differential performance assessment using simulated and real human lung normal/cancer data demonstrate a clear superiority of our approach over DSS, a recently proposed method for WGBS data analysis. Critically, these results demonstrate that marginal methods become statistically invalid when correlations are present in the data.

conclusionsThis contribution demonstrates clear benefits and the necessity of modeling joint probability distributions of methylation using the 1D Ising model of statistical physics and of quantifying methylation stochasticity using concepts from information theory. By employing this methodology, substantial improvement of DNA methylation analysis can be achieved by effectively taking into account the massive amount of statistical information available in WGBS data, which is largely ignored by existing methods.

Indexed as

Information TheoryModels, TheoreticalStatistics as TopicBase SequenceComputer SimulationCpG IslandsDNA MethylationEntropyEpigenesis, GeneticGene OntologyGenome, HumanHumansLung NeoplasmsProbabilitySulfitesWeb Browserhydrogen sulfiteSulfitesDNA methylationGenome analysisInformation theoryIsing modelMethylation analysisWGBS data modeling and analysis

Identifiers

PMID29514626
PMCPMC5842653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.