Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29514625›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2018

Palliative care in the emergency department: an educational investigation and intervention.

Jessica M Goldonowicz, Michael S Runyon, Mark J Bullard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Mapping the future for research in emergency medicine palliative care: A research roadmap.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Factors affecting initiation of palliative care in a Ugandan Emergency Department.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2021
    Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jessica M GoldonowiczDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Carolinas Medical Center, Carolinas Healthcare System, 1000 Blythe Blvd., 3rd Floor MEB, Charlotte, NC, 28203, USA.
Michael S RunyonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Carolinas Medical Center, Carolinas Healthcare System, 1000 Blythe Blvd., 3rd Floor MEB, Charlotte, NC, 28203, USA.
Mark J BullardDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Carolinas Medical Center, Carolinas Healthcare System, 1000 Blythe Blvd., 3rd Floor MEB, Charlotte, NC, 28203, USA. Mark.Bullard@carolinashealthcare.org.
Carolinas Healthcare System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo investigate the value of a novel simulation-based palliative care educational intervention within an emergency medicine (EM) residency curriculum.

methodsA palliative care scenario was designed and implemented in the simulation program at an urban academic emergency department (ED) with a 3-year EM residency program. EM residents attended one of eight high-fidelity simulation sessions, in groups of 5-6. A standardized participant portrayed the patient's family member. One resident from each session managed the scenario while the others observed. A 45-min debriefing session and small group discussion followed the scenario, facilitated by an EM simulation faculty member and a resident investigator. Best practices in palliative care were highlighted along with focused learner performance feedback. Participants completed an anonymous pre/post education intervention survey.

resultsForty of 42 EM residents (95%) participated in the study. Confidence in implementing palliative care skills and perceived importance of palliative care improved after this educational intervention. Specifically, residents 1) felt EM physicians had an important role in palliative care, 2) had increased confidence in the ability to determine patient decision-making capacity, 3) had improved confidence in initiating palliative discussions/treatment, 4) believed palliative education was important in residency, and 5) felt simulation was an effective means to learn palliative care. Differences noted between PGY1 and PGY 3 training levels in survey responses disappeared post-intervention. Residents noted being most comfortable with delivering bad news and symptom management and least comfortable with disease prognostication. Residents reported time constraints and implementation logistics in the ED as the most challenging factors for palliative care initiation.

conclusionOur case-based simulation intervention was associated with an increase in both the perceived importance of ED palliative care and self-reported confidence in implementing palliative care skills. Time constraints and implementation logistics were rated as the most challenging factors for palliative care initiation in the ED.

Indexed as

AdultCurriculumDecision MakingEmergency MedicineEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHospitals, UrbanHumansInternship and ResidencyMalePalliative CareProspective StudiesSimulation TrainingWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID29514625
PMCPMC5842635
OpenAlexW2797653443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.