Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29514621›Full record

ArticleBMC endocrine disorders2018

A predictive model of thyroid malignancy using clinical, biochemical and sonographic parameters for patients in a multi-center setting.

Jia Liu, Dongmei Zheng, Qiang Li, Xulei Tang, Zuojie Luo, Zhongshang Yuan, Ling Gao, Jiajun Zhao

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC endocrine disorders, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jia LiuDepartment of Endocrinology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250021, China.
Dongmei ZhengDepartment of Endocrinology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250021, China. dmeizheng@163.com.
Qiang LiDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150086, China.
Xulei TangDepartment of Endocrinology, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, 730000, China.
Zuojie LuoDepartment of Endocrinology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, China.
Zhongshang YuanDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250021, China.
Ling GaoShandong Clinical Medical Center of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Jinan, Shandong, 250021, China.
Jiajun ZhaoDepartment of Endocrinology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250021, China.

Funding

National Natural Sciences Foundation of China 81100593National Natural Sciences Foundation of China 81770785Provincial key research and development plan 2017GSF18154Science and Technology Department of Shandong Province 2015GGH318016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThyroid nodules are highly prevalent, but a robust, feasible method for malignancy differentiation has not yet been well documented. This study aimed to establish a practical model for thyroid nodule discrimination.

methodsRecords for 2984 patients who underwent thyroidectomy were analyzed. Clinical, laboratory, and US variables were assessed retrospectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed and a mathematical model was established for malignancy prediction.

resultsThe results showed that the malignant group was younger and had smaller nodules than the benign group (43.5 ± 11.6 vs. 48.5 ± 11.5 y, p < 0.001; 1.96 ± 1.16 vs. 2.75 ± 1.70 cm, p < 0.001, respectively). The serum thyrotropin (TSH) level (median = 1.63 mIU/L, IQR (0.89-2.66) vs. 1.19 (0.59-2.10), p < 0.001) was higher in the malignant group than in the benign group. Patients with malignancies tested positive for anti-thyroglobulin antibody (TGAb) and anti-thyroid peroxidase antibody (TPOAb) more frequently than those with benign nodules (TGAb, 30.3% vs. 15.0%, p < 0.001; TPOAb, 25.6% vs. 18.0%, p = 0.028). The prevalence of ultrasound (US) features (irregular shape, ill-defined margin, solid structure, hypoechogenicity, microcalcifications, macrocalcifications and central intranodular flow) was significantly higher in the malignant group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed that age (OR = 0.963, 95% CI = 0.934-0.993, p = 0.017), TGAb (OR = 4.435, 95% CI = 1.902-10.345, p = 0.001), hypoechogenicity (OR = 2.830, 95% CI = 1.113-7.195, p = 0.029), microcalcifications (OR = 4.624, 95% CI = 2.008-10.646, p < 0.001), and central intranodular flow (OR = 2.155, 95% CI = 1.011-4.594, p < 0.05) were independent predictors of thyroid malignancy. A predictive model including four variables (age, TGAb, hypoechogenicity and microcalcification) showed an optimal discriminatory accuracy (area under the curve, AUC) of 0.808 (95% CI = 0.761-0.855). The best cut-off value for prediction was 0.52, achieving sensitivity and specificity of 84.6% and 76.3%, respectively.

conclusionA predictive model of malignancy that combines clinical, laboratory and sonographic characteristics would aid clinicians in avoiding unnecessary procedures and making better clinical decisions.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAdultAutoantibodiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesThyroid HormonesThyroid NeoplasmsThyroid NoduleUltrasonographyanti-thyroglobulinAutoantibodiesThyroid Hormonesthyroid microsomal antibodiesMalignancyPredictive modelThyroid nodules

Identifiers

PMID29514621
PMCPMC5842594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.