ArticleBMC palliative care2018
Palliative care in the home: a scoping review of study quality, primary outcomes, and thematic component analysis.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Models, components and outcomes of palliative and end-of-life care provided to adults living at home: A systematic umbrella review of reviews.Palliative medicine · 2025Pooled it
- The Mediterranean Dietary Pattern and Inflammation in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021Pooled it
- Is there a relationship of negative oral health beliefs with dental fear and anxiety regarding diverse dental patient groups? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical oral investigations · 2019Pooled it
- Nursing interventions for patients in last days of life and their family caregivers at home: a protocol for a mixed methods systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2026Article
- Home-Based Palliative Care: Benefits, Challenges, Opportunities and Future Directions in a Super-Aged Society.Journal of hospice and palliative care · 2025Review
- Factors that support home deaths for patients receiving at-home palliative and end-of-life care: a sequential mixed-methods explanatory study.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- Informal Palliative Care at Home: A Focus Group Study Among Professionals Working in Palliative Care in Portugal.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Components of home-based palliative and supportive care for adults with heart failure: A scoping review.Palliative medicine · 2025Article
- Preparedness for Caregiving Role and Telehealth Use to Provide Informal Palliative Home Care in Portugal: A Qualitative Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Situational analysis of the quality of palliative care services across India: a cross-sectional survey.Ecancermedicalscience · 2022Article
- Home Based Palliative Care: Known Benefits and Future Directions.Current geriatrics reports · 2021Review
- Homecare and the COVID-19 Pandemic - Experience at an Urban Specialist Cancer Palliative Center.Indian journal of palliative care · 2020Article
- Study protocol: evaluation of specialized outpatient palliative care in the German state of Hesse (ELSAH study) - work package I: assessing the quality of care.BMC palliative care · 2018Article
- Geriatric palliative care: a view of its concept, challenges and strategies.BMC geriatrics · 2018Review
- Pilot Study on the Role of Board Certified Pharmacists in Palliative Pharmacy to Enhance Pharmacist Participation in Pre-Discharge Conferences for Home-Based Palliative Care in Japan.Palliative medicine reportsArticle
- Psychometric Properties of the 'Patients' Perspective of the Quality of Palliative Care Scale'.Indian journal of palliative careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of palliative care is to improve the quality of life of patients and families through the prevention and relief of suffering. Frequently, patients may choose to receive palliative care in the home. The objective of this paper is to summarize the quality and primary outcomes measured within the palliative care in the home literature. This will synthesize the current state of the literature and inform future work.
methodsA scoping review was completed using PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EconLit, PsycINFO, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database were searched from inception to August 2016. Inclusion criteria included: 1) care was provided in the "home of the patient" as defined by the study, 2) outcomes were reported, and 3) reported original data. Thematic component analysis was completed to categorize interventions.
resultsFifty-three studies formed the final data set. The literature varied extensively. Five themes were identified: accessibility of healthcare, caregiver support, individualized patient centered care, multidisciplinary care provision, and quality improvement. Primary outcomes were resource use, symptom burden, quality of life, satisfaction, caregiver distress, place of death, cost analysis, or described experiences. The majority of studies were of moderate or unclear quality.
conclusionsThere is robust literature of varying quality, assessing different components of palliative care in the home interventions, and measuring different outcomes. To be meaningful to patients, these interventions need to be consistently evaluated with outcomes that matter to patients. Future research could focus on reaching a consensus for outcomes to evaluate palliative care in the home interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.