Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29514608›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2018

Exploration for novel inhibitors showing back-to-front approach against VEGFR-2 kinase domain (4AG8) employing molecular docking mechanism and molecular dynamics simulations.

Shailima Rampogu, Ayoung Baek, Amir Zeb, Keun Woo Lee

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Rationale,RSC advances · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Antidiabetes study ofJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shailima RampoguDivision of Applied Life Science (BK21 Plus Program), Systems and Synthetic Agrobiotech Center (SSAC), Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Research Center (PMBBRC), Research Institute of Natural Science (RINS), Gyeongsang National University (GNU), 501 Jinju-daero, Jinju, 52828, Republic of Korea.
Ayoung BaekDivision of Applied Life Science (BK21 Plus Program), Systems and Synthetic Agrobiotech Center (SSAC), Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Research Center (PMBBRC), Research Institute of Natural Science (RINS), Gyeongsang National University (GNU), 501 Jinju-daero, Jinju, 52828, Republic of Korea.
Amir ZebDivision of Applied Life Science (BK21 Plus Program), Systems and Synthetic Agrobiotech Center (SSAC), Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Research Center (PMBBRC), Research Institute of Natural Science (RINS), Gyeongsang National University (GNU), 501 Jinju-daero, Jinju, 52828, Republic of Korea.
Keun Woo LeeDivision of Applied Life Science (BK21 Plus Program), Systems and Synthetic Agrobiotech Center (SSAC), Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Research Center (PMBBRC), Research Institute of Natural Science (RINS), Gyeongsang National University (GNU), 501 Jinju-daero, Jinju, 52828, Republic of Korea. kwlee@gnu.ac.kr.

Funding

Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program from Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea Grant no. PJ01106202Pioneer Research Center Program through the National Research Foundation NRF-2015M3C1A3023028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAngiogenesis is a process of formation of new blood vessels and is an important criteria demonstrated by cancer cells. Over a period of time, these cancer cells infect the other parts of the healthy body by a process called progression. The objective of the present article is to identify a drug molecule that inhibits angiogenesis and progression.

methodsIn this pursuit, ligand based pharmacophore virtual screening was employed, generating a pharmacophore model, Hypo1 consisting of four features. Furthermore, this Hypo1 was validated recruiting, Fischer's randomization, test set method and decoy set method. Later, Hypo1 was allowed to screen databases such as Maybridge, Chembridge, Asinex and NCI and were further filtered by ADMET filters and Lipinski's Rule of Five. A total of 699 molecules that passed the above criteria, were challenged against 4AG8, an angiogenic drug target employing GOLD v5.2.2.

resultsThe results rendered by molecular docking, DFT and the MD simulations showed only one molecule (Hit) obeyed the back-to-front approach. This molecule displayed a dock score of 89.77, involving the amino acids, Glu885 and Cys919, Asp1046, respectively and additionally formed several important hydrophobic interactions. Furthermore, the identified lead molecule showed interactions with key residues when challenged with CDK2 protein, 1URW.

conclusionThe lead candidate showed several interactions with the crucial residues of both the targets. Furthermore, we speculate that the residues Cys919 and Leu83 are important in the development of dual inhibitor. Therefore, the identified lead molecule can act as a potential inhibitor for angiogenesis and progression.

Indexed as

Drug DesignMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationAmino Acid SequenceCyclin-Dependent Kinase 2Databases, PharmaceuticalEnzyme InhibitorsHumansLigandsModels, MolecularProtein BindingSequence HomologyVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2CDK2 protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase 2Enzyme InhibitorsKDR protein, humanLigandsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2AngiogenesisBack-to-front approachMD simulationsProgressionVEGFR-2

Identifiers

PMID29514608
PMCPMC5842552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.