ReviewNucleic acids research2018
Capturing the 'ome': the expanding molecular toolbox for RNA and DNA library construction.
Review in Nucleic acids research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- A practical guide to targeted single-cell RNA sequencing technologies.Communications biology · 2026Review
- Re-appraising the evidence for the source, regulation and function of p53-family isoforms.Nucleic acids research · 2024Review
- Nanopore sequencing provides snapshots of the genetic variation within salmonid alphavirus-3 (SAV3) during an ongoing infection in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and brown trout (Salmo trutta).Veterinary research · 2024Article
- A Primer on the Analysis of High-Throughput Sequencing Data for Detection of Plant Viruses.Microorganisms · 2021Review
- Parallel analysis of miRNAs and mRNAs suggests distinct regulatory networks in Crassostrea gigas infected by Ostreid herpesvirus 1.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- A smart polymer for sequence-selective binding, pulldown, and release of DNA targets.Communications biology · 2020Article
- All-in-one sequencing: an improved library preparation method for cost-effective and high-throughput next-generation sequencing.Plant methods · 2020Article
- Phytovirome Analysis of Wild Plant Populations: Comparison of Double-Stranded RNA and Virion-Associated Nucleic Acid Metagenomic Approaches.Journal of virology · 2019Article
- Molecular sampling at logarithmic rates for next-generation sequencing.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Deconvolution of nucleic-acid length distributions: a gel electrophoresis analysis tool and applications.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- The Impact of cDNA Normalization on Long-Read Sequencing of a Complex Transcriptome.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
All sequencing experiments and most functional genomics screens rely on the generation of libraries to comprehensively capture pools of targeted sequences. In the past decade especially, driven by the progress in the field of massively parallel sequencing, numerous studies have comprehensively assessed the impact of particular manipulations on library complexity and quality, and characterized the activities and specificities of several key enzymes used in library construction. Fortunately, careful protocol design and reagent choice can substantially mitigate many of these biases, and enable reliable representation of sequences in libraries. This review aims to guide the reader through the vast expanse of literature on the subject to promote informed library generation, independent of the application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.