Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29514301›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2018

Genomic Amplifications and Distal 6q Loss: Novel Markers for Poor Survival in High-risk Neuroblastoma Patients.

Pauline Depuydt, Valentina Boeva, Toby D Hocking, Robrecht Cannoodt, Inge M Ambros, Peter F Ambros, Shahab Asgharzadeh, Edward F Attiyeh, Valérie Combaret, Raffaella Defferrari and 25 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Science advances · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Neuroblastoma Patients' Outcome and Chromosomal Instability.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

35 authors.

Pauline DepuydtCenter for Medical Genetics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Valentina BoevaInstitut Cochin, Inserm U1016, CNRS UMR 8104, Université Paris Descartes UMR-S1016, Paris, France.
Toby D HockingDepartment of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Robrecht CannoodtCenter for Medical Genetics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Inge M AmbrosChildren's Cancer Research Institute, Austria.
Peter F AmbrosChildren's Cancer Research Institute, Austria.
Shahab AsgharzadehDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA.
Edward F AttiyehDivision of Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Valérie CombaretCentre Léon-Bérard, Laboratoire de Recherche Translationnelle, Lyon, France.
Raffaella DefferrariDepartment of Pathology, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy.
Matthias FischerDepartment of Experimental Pediatric Oncology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Barbara HeroDepartment of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Michael D HogartyDivision of Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Meredith S IrwinDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jan KosterDepartment of Oncogenomics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Susan KreissmanDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Ruth LadensteinChildren's Cancer Research Institute, Austria.
Eve LapoubleGenetic Somatic Unit.
Geneviève LaureysDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan, Ghent, Belgium.
Wendy B LondonDana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Katia MazzoccoDepartment of Pathology, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy.
Akira NakagawaraSaga Medical Center KOSEIKAN, Saga, Japan.
Rosa NogueraPathology Department, Medical School, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Miki OhiraResearch Institute for Clinical Oncology Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan.
Julie R ParkSeattle Children's Hospital and University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Ulrike PötschgerChildren's Cancer Research Institute, Austria.
Jessica TheissenDepartment of Experimental Pediatric Oncology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Gian Paolo ToniniLaboratory of Neuroblastoma, Onco/Haematology Laboratory, University of Padua, Pediatric Research Institute (IRP)-Città della Speranza, Padova, Italy.
Dominique Valteau-CouanetInstitut Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Sud, Paris, France.
Luigi VaresioLaboratory of Molecular Biology (LV), Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy.
Rogier VersteegDepartment of Oncogenomics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Frank SpelemanCenter for Medical Genetics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
John M MarisDivision of Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Gudrun SchleiermacherU830 INSERM, Recherche Translationelle en Oncologie Pédiatrique (RTOP) and Department of Pediatric Oncology.
Katleen De PreterCenter for Medical Genetics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

Worldwide Cancer Research 16-1294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Neuroblastoma is characterized by substantial clinical heterogeneity. Despite intensive treatment, the survival rates of high-risk neuroblastoma patients are still disappointingly low. Somatic chromosomal copy number aberrations have been shown to be associated with patient outcome, particularly in low- and intermediate-risk neuroblastoma patients. To improve outcome prediction in high-risk neuroblastoma, we aimed to design a prognostic classification method based on copy number aberrations. Methods: In an international collaboration, normalized high-resolution DNA copy number data (arrayCGH and SNP arrays) from 556 high-risk neuroblastomas obtained at diagnosis were collected from nine collaborative groups and segmented using the same method. We applied logistic and Cox proportional hazard regression to identify genomic aberrations associated with poor outcome. Results: In this study, we identified two types of copy number aberrations that are associated with extremely poor outcome. Distal 6q losses were detected in 5.9% of patients and were associated with a 10-year survival probability of only 3.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.5% to 23.3%, two-sided P = .002). Amplifications of regions not encompassing the MYCN locus were detected in 18.1% of patients and were associated with a 10-year survival probability of only 5.8% (95% CI = 1.5% to 22.2%, two-sided P < .001). Conclusions: Using a unique large copy number data set of high-risk neuroblastoma cases, we identified a small subset of high-risk neuroblastoma patients with extremely low survival probability that might be eligible for inclusion in clinical trials of new therapeutics. The amplicons may also nominate alternative treatments that target the amplified genes.

Indexed as

Chromosome DeletionChromosomes, Human, Pair 6Gene AmplificationGenomicsBiomarkers, TumorChild, PreschoolDNA Copy Number VariationsGenetic Association StudiesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansInfantNeoplasm StagingNeuroblastomaN-Myc Proto-Oncogene ProteinPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorMYCN protein, humanN-Myc Proto-Oncogene Protein

Identifiers

PMID29514301
PMCPMC6186524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.