Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29513718›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Acral melanoma detection using a convolutional neural network for dermoscopy images.

Chanki Yu, Sejung Yang, Wonoh Kim, Jinwoong Jung, Kee-Yang Chung, Sang Wook Lee, Byungho Oh

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Using the power of artificial intelligence to improve the diagnosis and management of nonmelanoma skin cancer.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Image Quality Assessment Using Convolutional Neural Network in Clinical Skin Images.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Deep Learning in Dermatology: A Systematic Review of Current Approaches, Outcomes, and Limitations.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Chanki YuDepartment of Media Technology, Graduate School of Media, Sogang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sejung YangMedical Physics Division, Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, United States of America.
Wonoh KimDepartment of Dermatology, Keimyung University, College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Jinwoong JungDepartment of Dermatology, Keimyung University, College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Kee-Yang ChungDepartment of Dermatology and Cutaneous Biology Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sang Wook LeeDepartment of Media Technology, Graduate School of Media, Sogang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Byungho OhDepartment of Dermatology, Keimyung University, College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9575-5665
Keimyung University · KREwha Womans University · KRSogang University · KRYonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background/purposeAcral melanoma is the most common type of melanoma in Asians, and usually results in a poor prognosis due to late diagnosis. We applied a convolutional neural network to dermoscopy images of acral melanoma and benign nevi on the hands and feet and evaluated its usefulness for the early diagnosis of these conditions.

methodsA total of 724 dermoscopy images comprising acral melanoma (350 images from 81 patients) and benign nevi (374 images from 194 patients), and confirmed by histopathological examination, were analyzed in this study. To perform the 2-fold cross validation, we split them into two mutually exclusive subsets: half of the total image dataset was selected for training and the rest for testing, and we calculated the accuracy of diagnosis comparing it with the dermatologist's and non-expert's evaluation.

resultsThe accuracy (percentage of true positive and true negative from all images) of the convolutional neural network was 83.51% and 80.23%, which was higher than the non-expert's evaluation (67.84%, 62.71%) and close to that of the expert (81.08%, 81.64%). Moreover, the convolutional neural network showed area-under-the-curve values like 0.8, 0.84 and Youden's index like 0.6795, 0.6073, which were similar score with the expert.

conclusionAlthough further data analysis is necessary to improve their accuracy, convolutional neural networks would be helpful to detect acral melanoma from dermoscopy images of the hands and feet.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerDermoscopyEarly Detection of CancerFootHandHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMelanomaSensitivity and SpecificitySkinSkin Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID29513718
PMCPMC5841780
OpenAlexW2792411327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.