Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29513693›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Health and health risk behaviour of adolescents-Differences according to family structure. Results of the German KiGGS cohort study.

Petra Rattay, Elena von der Lippe, Elvira Mauz, Felicitas Richter, Heike Hölling, Cornelia Lange, Thomas Lampert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Petra RattayDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5093-2584
Elena von der LippeDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Elvira MauzDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Felicitas RichterDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Heike HöllingDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Cornelia LangeDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Thomas LampertDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study's aim was to investigate the association between family structure and different health-related outcomes in adolescence (self-rated health, emotional and behavioural problems, health-related quality of life, regular smoking, and heavy episodic drinking). Furthermore, we analysed the extent to which socio-economic status, family cohesion and the pre-transition health status explain family structure-related health disparities.

methodsWe used longitudinal data from the first two waves of the German KiGGS cohort study carried out by the Robert Koch Institute (baseline: 2003-2006, follow-up: 2009-2012). The sample comprised 4,692 respondents aged 11 to 17 years. Using data from both waves, effects of family structure on health status at follow-up were calculated applying linear and logistic regression models.

resultsWe found that adolescents continuously living with both birth parents were in good health. Adolescents whose parents separated after the baseline survey, reported poorer health and were more likely to smoke. The transition from stepfamily to single parent family was also associated with a higher risk of regular smoking. Lower health-related quality of life as well as higher scores for emotional and behavioural problems occurred in almost all non-nuclear family structures, although not all effects were statistically significant. No significant effects of family structure on heavy episodic drinking were found. While family cohesion mediated the effects of family structure on adolescents' health, the mediating effect of socio-economic status was small. After controlling for pre-transition health, the effects were even lower.

conclusionsBecause the direct effects of family structure on adolescents' health were small and family cohesion was found to be an important mediator in the association between family structure and adolescents' health, prevention programmes and interventions should be directed towards the parent-adolescent relationship rather than just the family structure, in order to minimize the psychosocial stress of adolescents during the period of family transition.

Indexed as

Family RelationsHealth Risk BehaviorsHealth StatusAdolescentAdolescent HealthChildCohort StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansLinear ModelsLogistic ModelsMaleParentsPsychology, Adolescent

Identifiers

PMID29513693
PMCPMC5841741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.