Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29512480›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2018

Knowledge and Adherence to the National Guidelines for Malaria Diagnosis in Pregnancy among Health-Care Providers and Drug-Outlet Dispensers in Rural Western Kenya.

Christina Riley, Stephanie Dellicour, Peter Ouma, Urbanus Kioko, Ahmeddin Omar, Simon Kariuki, Zipporah Ng'ang'a, Meghna Desai, Ann M Buff, Julie R Gutman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Christina RileyRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Stephanie DellicourLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Peter OumaKEMRI, Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.
Urbanus KiokoMalaria Control Unit, Ministry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
Ahmeddin OmarMalaria Control Unit, Ministry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
Simon KariukiKEMRI, Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.
Zipporah Ng'ang'aCollege of Health Sciences, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya.
Meghna DesaiMalaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia and Kenya.
Ann M BuffU.S. President's Malaria Initiative, Nairobi, Kenya.
Julie R GutmanMalaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia and Kenya.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prompt diagnosis and effective treatment of acute malaria in pregnancy (MiP) is important for the mother and fetus; data on health-care provider adherence to diagnostic guidelines in pregnancy are limited. From September to November 2013, a cross-sectional survey was conducted in 51 health facilities and 39 drug outlets in Western Kenya. Provider knowledge of national diagnostic guidelines for uncomplicated MiP were assessed using standardized questionnaires. The use of parasitologic testing was assessed in health facilities via exit interviews with febrile women of childbearing age and in drug outlets via simulated-client scenarios, posing as pregnant women or their spouses. Overall, 93% of providers tested for malaria or accurately described signs and symptoms consistent with clinical malaria. Malaria was parasitologically confirmed in 77% of all patients presenting with febrile illness at health facilities and 5% of simulated clients at drug outlets. Parasitological testing was available in 80% of health facilities; 92% of patients evaluated at these facilities were tested. Only 23% of drug outlets had malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs); at these outlets, RDTs were offered in 17% of client simulations. No differences were observed in testing rates by pregnancy trimester. The study highlights gaps among health providers in diagnostic knowledge and practice related to MiP, and the lack of malaria diagnostic capacity, particularly in drug outlets. The most important factor associated with malaria testing of pregnant women was the availability of diagnostics at the point of service. Interventions that increase the availability of malaria diagnostic services might improve malaria case management in pregnant women.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelHealth PolicyAdultAntimalarialsDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFemaleHealth FacilitiesHumansKenyaMalariaPregnancyPregnancy Complications, ParasiticPrivate SectorRural PopulationAntimalarials

Identifiers

PMID29512480
PMCPMC5953364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.