Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29512028›Full record

ReviewInfection2018

Essentials in the management of S. aureus bloodstream infection.

N Jung, S Rieg

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Infection, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Characterization ofInfection and drug resistance · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Management ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. On the Etiological Relevance ofEuropean journal of microbiology & immunology · 2019
    Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. [Current status of antibiotic therapy for Staphylococcus aureus sepsis in children].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

N JungDepartment I for Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, 50924, Cologne, Germany. norma.jung@uk-koeln.de.
S RiegDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsStaphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection is one of the most common serious bacterial infections worldwide. It represents a heterogenous clinical entity with a high risk of metastatic complications and a high in-hospital mortality ranging between 20 and 30%. The outcome can be improved by optimised diagnostic and therapeutic management. Thus, our minireview should provide important and often missed pieces of information in the management of S. aureus bloodstream infection.

methodsWe describe the essentials in the management of S. aureus bloodstream infection.

resultsFive essentials were identified: 1) S. aureus bacteremia should always be considered clinically significant. 2) Length of bacteremia and fever is relevant for diagnostic workup, duration of therapy and prognosis. 3) Prompt identification and eradication of portal of entry and infective/metastatic foci are essential. 4) Infective endocarditis should be excluded. 5) Intravenous treatment for at least two weeks up to 4-6 weeks with antistaphylococcal penicillins for MSSA and vancomycin or daptomycin for MRSA bloodstream infection is indicated.

conclusionFurther efforts should be undertaken to increase the adherence to the essentials in the management of S. aureus bloodstream infection.

Indexed as

BacteremiaStaphylococcus aureusDisease ManagementHumansStaphylococcal InfectionsBlood culturesBloodstream infectionEchocardiographyInfectious disease consultationIntravenous therapyManagementS. aureusSource identification

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.