ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2018
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- A multimodality imaging approach to the diagnosis of infective endocarditis: incremental value of combining modalities.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Review
- Innovations in Imaging:Current cardiology reports · 2024Review
- Contemporary Role of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Endocarditis: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- One Fell Swoop: Septic Muscle Embolism and Central Venous Catheter Infection Imaged with [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Contemporary Review of Multi-Modality Cardiac Imaging Evaluation of Infective Endocarditis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Nuclear Imaging in Infective Endocarditis.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- FDG uptake in marrow and spleen: What does it mean? : Importance of clinical context in the interpretation of FDG uptake in marrow and spleen in infective endocarditis.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- Impact of unknown incidental findings in PET/CT examinations of patients with proven or suspected vascular graft or endograft infections.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the infection of heart.Yeungnam University journal of medicine · 2021Article
- Observational
- Use of whole body PET scan in patients with infective endocarditis may impact care of those with intravascular devices: results from a comparative retrospective cohort study.Therapeutic advances in infectious diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review analyzes recent studies evaluating the diagnostic value of RECENT
findingsDetection of extracardiac septic localizations in patients with infective endocarditis and cardiac device infections is crucial, as it may impact the diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic management. Recent literature substantiated the clinical usefulness of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.