Trial reportJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2018
Impact of continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring on hemodynamic fluctuation during general anesthesia: a randomized controlled study.
Trial report in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04752904 (Noninvasive Continuous Blood Pressure Monitoring for Preventing Post-spinal Hypotension During Cesarean Delivery), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Noninvasive Continuous Blood Pressure Monitoring for Preventing Post-spinal Hypotension During Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intraoperative haemodynamic monitoring and management of adults having non-cardiac surgery: Guidelines of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine in collaboration with the German Association of the Scientific Medical Societies.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2024Guideline
- Comparative outcomes of awake spine surgery under spinal versus general anesthesia: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024Pooled it
- The Impact of Individualized Hemodynamic Management on Intraoperative Fluid Balance and Hemodynamic Interventions during Spine Surgery in the Prone Position: A Prospective Randomized Trial.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Trial
- Cholinesterase deficiency and anesthesia management: Clinical challenges and coping strategies.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026Review
- The Analysis of Multiple Outcomes between General and Regional Anesthesia in Hip Fracture Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Measurement of Blood Pressure by Ultrasound-The Applicability of Devices, Algorithms and a View in Local Hemodynamics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Usefulness of non-invasive cardiac output monitoring in elderly patients undergoing monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: a pilot study.The Journal of international medical research · 2020Article
- Journal of clinical monitoring and computing end of year summary 2018: hemodynamic monitoring and management.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study assessed the ability of a continuous non-invasive blood pressure (BP) monitoring system to reduce intra-anesthetic hemodynamic fluctuation compared with intermittent BP cuff measurement. Forty patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty under general anesthesia were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups (Control and CS group). BP management was performed using the same protocol with BP measured by intermittent BP cuff in the Control and that by continuous non-invasive BP monitoring in the CS group. We assessed the accuracy and precision of the continuous non-invasive BP monitoring compared with BP cuff measurement using Bland-Altman, four-quadrant plot, and polar-plot analyses. Additionally, the occurrence of hypotension and hypertention during general anesthesia was compared between the two groups. The continuous non-invasive BP monitoring showed excellent accuracy of - 1.1 ± 8.1 mmHg during surgery and an acceptable trending ability with a concordance rate of 95.1% according to the four-quadrant plot analysis and an angular concordance rate of 86.7% by polar-plot analysis. Hypotension was less common in the CS group during induction of anesthesia (p = 0.002) and surgery (p = 0.008). Hypertension occurred more frequently in the Control group during emergence from anesthesia (p = 0.037). The duration of hemodynamic stability (systolic BP 80-110% of baseline) intraoperatively was longer in the CS group than in the Control group (87.7 vs. 61.9%; p < 0.001). Accuracy and trending ability of the continuous non-invasive BP monitoring was clinically acceptable, and lead to hemodynamic stability and reduction of intra-anesthetic hypotension and hypertension intraoperatively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.