Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29511951›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2018

Predictors of response to fixed-dose vasopressin in adult patients with septic shock.

Gretchen L Sacha, Simon W Lam, Abhijit Duggal, Heather Torbic, Stephanie N Bass, Sarah C Welch, Robert S Butler, Seth R Bauer

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03014063 (Vasopressin Plasma Concentrations in Responders and Non-responders to Exogenous Vasopressin Infusion in Patients With Septic Shock), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03014063 completednot on this map

Vasopressin Plasma Concentrations in Responders and Non-responders to Exogenous Vasopressin Infusion in Patients With Septic Shock

TypeobservationalSponsorThe Cleveland ClinicRan2016 to 2017Enrolled18ConditionsSeptic Shock
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Timing of Vasopressin Initiation in Patients with Septic Shock: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Vasoactive Agents in Burn Patients: Perspectives on Angiotensin-II.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. [Vasoactive agents in septic shock-individualized strategies].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gretchen L SachaDepartment of Pharmacy, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue (Hb-105), Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. sachag@ccf.org.
Simon W LamDepartment of Pharmacy, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue (Hb-105), Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Abhijit DuggalRespiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Heather TorbicDepartment of Pharmacy, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue (Hb-105), Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Stephanie N BassDepartment of Pharmacy, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue (Hb-105), Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Sarah C WelchDepartment of Pharmacy, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue (Hb-105), Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Robert S ButlerDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Seth R BauerDepartment of Pharmacy, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue (Hb-105), Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVasopressin is often utilized for hemodynamic support in patients with septic shock. However, the most appropriate patient to initiate therapy in is unknown. This study was conducted to determine factors associated with hemodynamic response to fixed-dose vasopressin in patients with septic shock.

methodsSingle-center, retrospective cohort of patients receiving fixed-dose vasopressin for septic shock for at least 6 h with concomitant catecholamines in the medical, surgical, or neurosciences intensive care unit (ICU) at a tertiary care center. Patients were classified as responders or non-responders to fixed-dose vasopressin. Response was defined as a decrease in catecholamine dose requirements and achievement of mean arterial pressure ≥ 65 mmHg at 6 h after initiation of vasopressin.

resultsA total of 938 patients were included: 426 responders (45%), 512 non-responders (55%). Responders had lower rates of in-hospital (57 vs. 72%; P < 0.001) and ICU mortality (50 vs. 68%; P < 0.001), and increased ICU-free days at day 14 and hospital-free days at day 28 (2.3 ± 3.8 vs. 1.6 ± 3.3; P < 0.001 and 4.2 ± 7.2 vs. 2.8 ± 6.0; P < 0.001, respectively). On multivariable analysis, non-medical ICU location was associated with increased response odds (OR 1.70; P = 0.0049) and lactate at vasopressin initiation was associated with decreased response odds (OR 0.93; P = 0.0003). Factors not associated with response included APACHE III score, SOFA score, corticosteroid use, and catecholamine dose.

conclusionIn this evaluation, 45% responded to the addition of vasopressin with improved outcomes compared to non-responders. The only factors found to be associated with vasopressin response were ICU location and lactate concentration.

Indexed as

CatecholaminesNorepinephrineSepsisSeptic shockVasopressinVasopressors

Identifiers

PMID29511951
PMCPMC5840112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.