Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29511945›Full record

ArticleCytotechnology2018

Investigating the establishment of primary cultures of hemocytes from Mytilus edulis.

Andrew Barrick, Catherine Guillet, Catherine Mouneyrac, Amélie Châtel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cytotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Gene delivery available in molluscan cells by strong promoter discovered from bivalve-infectious virus.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Functional and Morphological Changes Induced inNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  10. From the raw bar to the bench: Bivalves as models for human health.Developmental and comparative immunology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew BarrickMerMolecules Sante, Universite Catholique de l'Ouest, Angers Cedex 09, France. Andrew.barrick@etud.uco.fr.
Catherine GuilletPlateforme d'Analyse Cellulaire et Moléculaire, IBS-IRIS, Université d'Angers, 4, Rue Larrey, 49933, Angers Cedex 09, France.
Catherine MouneyracMerMolecules Sante, Universite Catholique de l'Ouest, Angers Cedex 09, France.
Amélie ChâtelMerMolecules Sante, Universite Catholique de l'Ouest, Angers Cedex 09, France.

Funding

H2020 European Research Council 646221
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthropogenic influences on the environment have been become a focal point for many social and political endeavors. With an ever-increasing rate of new contaminants being introduced into the environment every year, regulatory policies have begun to shift to prevention rather than mitigation. However, current in vivo testing strategies, in addition to ethical considerations, are too expensive and time consuming to adequately screen potential contaminants within a realistic timeframe. As a result, in vitro testing on cell cultures has been identified as an ideal alternative testing strategy for emerging contaminants. In the context of ecotoxicology, in vitro testing has had limited use particularly with marine invertebrates like the marine mussel Mytilus edulis mainly due to difficulties in establishing longer term cell cultures and cell lines. The aim of this study was to define an optimal technique (extraction and maintenance) for establishing a primary cell culture on M. edulis hemocytes that could be used for screening contaminants.

Indexed as

ContaminantsIn vitro screeningMytilus edulisPrimary cell culture

Identifiers

PMID29511945
PMCPMC6081918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.