Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29511920›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2018

The acute effect of Quercetin on muscle performance following a single resistance training session.

Federica Patrizio, Massimiliano Ditroilo, Francesco Felici, Guglielmo Duranti, Giuseppe De Vito, Stefania Sabatini, Massimo Sacchetti, Ilenia Bazzucchi

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. The Effect ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  13. Comparative Metabolomic Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Quercetin in Sports and Exercise: A review.International journal of exercise science · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Federica PatrizioLaboratory of Exercise Physiology, Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Roma "Foro Italico", Piazza Lauro De Bosis 6, Roma, 00135, Italy.
Massimiliano DitroiloSchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, Institute of Sport and Health, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Francesco FeliciLaboratory of Exercise Physiology, Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Roma "Foro Italico", Piazza Lauro De Bosis 6, Roma, 00135, Italy.
Guglielmo DurantiLaboratory of Biochemistry of Movement, Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Roma "Foro Italico", Piazza Lauro De Bosis 6, Roma, 00135, Italy.
Giuseppe De VitoSchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, Institute of Sport and Health, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Stefania SabatiniLaboratory of Biochemistry of Movement, Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Roma "Foro Italico", Piazza Lauro De Bosis 6, Roma, 00135, Italy.
Massimo SacchettiLaboratory of Exercise Physiology, Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Roma "Foro Italico", Piazza Lauro De Bosis 6, Roma, 00135, Italy.
Ilenia BazzucchiLaboratory of Exercise Physiology, Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Roma "Foro Italico", Piazza Lauro De Bosis 6, Roma, 00135, Italy. ilenia.bazzucchi@uniroma4.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6017-1683

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo examine the effect of acute quercetin (Q) ingestion on neuromuscular function, biomarkers of muscle damage, and rate of perceived exertion (RPE) in response to an acute bout of resistance training.

methods10 young men (22.1 ± 1.8 years, 24.1 ± 3.1 BMI) participated in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Subjects consumed Q (1 g/day) or placebo (PLA) 3 h prior to a resistance training session which consisted of 3 sets of 8 repetitions at 80% of the one repetition maximum (1RM) completed bilaterally for eight different resistance exercises. Electromyographic (EMG) signals were recorded from the knee extensor muscles during maximal isometric (MVIC) and isokinetic voluntary contractions, and during an isometric fatiguing test. Mechanical and EMG signals, biomarkers of cell damage, and RPE score were measured PRE, immediately POST, and 24 h (blood indices only) following the resistance exercise.

resultsAfter a single dose of Q, the torque-velocity curve of knee extensors was enhanced and after the resistance exercise, subjects showed a lower MVIC reduction (Q: 0.91 ± 6.10%, PLA: 8.66 ± 5.08%) with a greater rate of torque development (+ 10.6%, p < 0.005) and neuromuscular efficiency ratio (+ 28.2%, p < 0.005). Total volume of the resistance exercises was significantly greater in Q (1691.10 ± 376.71 kg rep) compared to PLA (1663.65 ± 378.85 kg rep) (p < 0.05) with a comparable RPE score. No significant differences were found in blood marker between treatments.

conclusionsThe acute ingestion of Q may enhance the neuromuscular performance during and after a resistance training session.

Indexed as

Resistance TrainingAntioxidantsHumansMaleMuscle FatigueMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthMyalgiaQuercetinYoung AdultAntioxidantsQuercetinElectromyographyFlavonoidsMuscle damageStrength

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.