ReviewHeart failure reviews2018
Redefining biomarkers in heart failure.
Review in Heart failure reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Role of Congestion Biomarkers in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Review
- Predictive Value of the Serum Cystatin C/Prealbumin Ratio in Combination With NT-proBNP Levels for Long-Term Prognosis in Chronic Heart Failure Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Article
- New Targets in Heart Failure Drug Therapy.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
- Differential Role of Circulating microRNAs to Track Progression and Pre-Symptomatic Stage of Chronic Heart Failure: A Pilot Study.Biomedicines · 2020Article
- Assessment of Cardiac Remodeling-A Chance for Novel Cardiac Biomarkers?Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Elevated CA-125 as Humoral Biomarker of Congestive Heart Failure: Illustrative Cases and a Short Review of Literature.Case reports in cardiology · 2020Article
- Apela/Elabela/Toddler: New perspectives in molecular mechanism of heart failure.Global cardiology science & practice · 2019Review
- The Predictive Value of Plasma Brain Natriuretic Peptide and Galectin-3 in Elderly Patients Admitted for Heart Failure.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- Predictive biomarkers for death and rehospitalization in comorbid frail elderly heart failure patients.BMC geriatrics · 2018Article
- Circulating monocyte subsets and heart failure prognosis.PloS one · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) is the end result of many different cardiac and non-cardiac abnormalities leading to a complex clinical entity. In this view, the use of biomarkers in HF should be deeply reconsidered; indeed, the same biomarker may carry a different significance in patients with preserved or reduced EF. The aim of this review is to reconsider the role of biomarkers in HF, based on the different clinical characteristics of this syndrome. The role of cardiac and non-cardiac biomarkers will be reviewed with respect of the different clinical manifestations of this syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.