Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29511883›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2018

Validation of a 10-gene molecular signature for predicting biochemical recurrence and clinical metastasis in localized prostate cancer.

Hatem Abou-Ouf, Mohammed Alshalalfa, Mandeep Takhar, Nicholas Erho, Bryan Donnelly, Elai Davicioni, R Jeffrey Karnes, Tarek A Bismar

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. International journal of medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hatem Abou-OufDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Mohammed AlshalalfaGenome DX Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA.
Mandeep TakharGenome DX Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA.
Nicholas ErhoGenome DX Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA.
Bryan DonnellyDepartment of Urology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Elai DavicioniGenome DX Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA.
R Jeffrey KarnesDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Tarek A BismarDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, AB, Canada. tabismar@ucalgary.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9190-5088

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo validate a previously characterized 10-gene signature in prostate cancer with implication to distinguish aggressive and indolent disease within low and intermediate patients' risk groups.

methodsA case-control study design used to select 545 patients from the Mayo clinic tumor registry who underwent radical prostatectomy. A training set from this cohort (n = 359) was used to build a 10-gene model, based on high-dimensional discriminant analysis (HDDA10) to predict several endpoints of clinical patients' outcome. An independent set (n = 219) from the same institution was used as validation set.

resultsHDDA10 showed significant performance for predicting metastasis (Mets) (AUC 0.68, p = 6.4E - 6) and biochemical recurrence (BCR) (AUC = 0.65, p = 0.003) in the validation set outperforming Gleason grade grouping (GG) for BCR (AUC 0.57, p = 0.03) and with comparable performance for Mets endpoint (GG AUC 0.66, p = 8.1E - 5). HDDA10 prognostic significance was superior to any clinical-pathological parameter within GG2 + 3 (GS7) patients achieving an AUC of 0.74 (p = 0.0037) for BCR compared to Gleason pattern 4 (AUC 0.64) (p = 0.015) and AUC for Mets of 0.68 versus AUC of 0.65 for Gleason pattern 4 (p = 0.01). HDDA10 remained significant for both BCR and Mets in multivariate analysis, suggesting that it can be used to increase accuracy in stratifying patients eligible for active surveillance.

conclusionHDDA10 is of added value to GG and other clinical-pathological parameters in predicting BCR and Mets endpoint, especially in the low to intermediate patients' risk groups. HDDA10 prognostic value should be further validated prospectively in stratifying patients specifically in low to intermediate GS (GG1-2), such as active surveillance programs.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesGene Expression ProfilingHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisProstateProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsReproducibility of ResultsBiochemical recurrenceBiomarkersClinical metastasisGenetic classifierGleason scoreGrade groupingPrognosisProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID29511883
PMCPMC11813503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.