Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29511857›Full record

ArticleJournal of mathematical biology2018

The impact of exclusion processes on angiogenesis models.

Samara Pillay, Helen M Byrne, Philip K Maini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mathematical biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Comparative analysis of continuum angiogenesis models.Journal of mathematical biology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samara PillayMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK. samara.pillay@maths.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7381-7191
Helen M ByrneMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
Philip K MainiMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.

Funding

Schlumberger Foundation Faculty for the Future Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Angiogenesis is the process by which new blood vessels form from existing vessels. During angiogenesis, tip cells migrate via diffusion and chemotaxis, new tip cells are introduced through branching, loops form via tip-to-tip and tip-to-sprout anastomosis, and a vessel network forms as endothelial cells, known as stalk cells, follow the paths of tip cells (a process known as the snail-trail). Using a mean-field approximation, we systematically derive one-dimensional non-linear continuum models from a lattice-based cellular automaton model of angiogenesis in the corneal assay, explicitly accounting for cell volume. We compare our continuum models and a well-known phenomenological snail-trail model that is linear in the diffusive, chemotactic and branching terms, with averaged cellular automaton simulation results to distinguish macroscale volume exclusion effects and determine whether linear models can capture them. We conclude that, in general, both linear and non-linear models can be used at low cell densities when single or multi-species exclusion effects are negligible at the macroscale. When cell densities increase, our non-linear model should be used to capture non-linear tip cell behavior that occurs when single-species exclusion effects are pronounced, and alternative models should be derived for non-negligible multi-species exclusion effects.

Indexed as

Models, CardiovascularNeovascularization, PathologicNeovascularization, PhysiologicAnimalsCell MovementChemotaxisComputer SimulationCorneal NeovascularizationEndothelial CellsHumansLinear ModelsMathematical ConceptsModels, BiologicalNonlinear DynamicsStochastic ProcessesAngiogenesisCellular automatonChemotaxisMultiscale modelingPartial differential equationsVolume exclusion

Identifiers

PMID29511857
PMCPMC6280878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.