Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29511840›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2018

Soil Inoculation with Bacillus spp. Modifies Root Endophytic Bacterial Diversity, Evenness, and Community Composition in a Context-Specific Manner.

Kiran R Gadhave, Paul F Devlin, Andreas Ebertz, Arabella Ross, Alan C Gange

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. A smooth vetch (Frontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  9. The seed microbiomes of staple food crops.Microbial biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Bacterial Inoculant and Sucrose Amendments Improve the Growth ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Towards sustainable agriculture: rhizosphere microbiome engineering.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kiran R GadhaveSchool of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK.
Paul F DevlinSchool of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK. paul.devlin@rhul.ac.uk.
Andreas EbertzSchool of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK.
Arabella RossSchool of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK.
Alan C GangeSchool of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of microbial inoculants containing plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria as a promoter of plant fitness and health is becoming increasingly popular in agriculture. However, whether and how these bacteria affect indigenous bacterial communities in field conditions is sparsely explored. We studied the effects of seed inoculation and field soil application of ubiquitous soil bacteria, B. cereus, B. subtilis, and B. amyloliquefaciens, on the diversity, evenness, and richness of endophytic bacterial communities in sprouting broccoli roots using high-throughput metagenome sequencing. The multiple operational taxonomic units (OTUs) assigned to different bacterial taxa clearly showed changes in ecological measures and relative abundances of certain taxa between control and treatment groups. The Bacillus inocula, themselves, failed to flourish as endophytes; however, the effects they extended on the endophytic bacterial community were both generic as well as species specific. In each case, Pseudomonadales, Rhizobiales, Xanthomonadales, and Burkholderiales were the most abundant orders in the endosphere. B. amyloliquefaciens drastically reduced the most abundant genus, Pseudomonas, while increasing the relative abundance of a range of minor taxa. The Shannon-Weiner diversity and Buzas and Gibson's evenness indices showed that the diversity and evenness were increased in both B. amyloliquefaciens and mixed treated plants. The UniFrac measurement of beta diversity showed that all treatments affected the specific composition of the endophytic bacterial community, with an apparent interspecies competition in the mixed treatment. Taken together, Bacillus species influenced the diversity, evenness, and composition of the endophytic bacterial community. However, these effects varied between different Bacillus spp. in a context-specific manner.

Indexed as

BiodiversitySoil MicrobiologyAgricultural InoculantsBacillusBacteriaBrassicaEndophytesPhylogenyPlant RootsSpecies Specificity454 pyrosequencingBacillusEndophytesMicrobial inoculantsPlant growth-promoting rhizobacteria

Identifiers

PMID29511840
PMCPMC6132550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.