Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29511838›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2018

The roles of

Soyoung Kim, Dongwoo Kim, Se Hoon Kim, Mi-Ae Park, Jong Hee Chang, Mijin Yun

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Recent Update on PET/CT Radiotracers for Imaging Cerebral Glioma.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. 60 Years of Achievements by KSNM in Neuroimaging Research.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. IncreasedJournal of neuro-oncology · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Commented on by
    2018
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Soyoung KimDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, South Korea.
Dongwoo KimDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, South Korea.
Se Hoon KimDepartment of Pathology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Mi-Ae ParkDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jong Hee ChangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, South Korea. changjh@yuhs.ac.
Mijin YunDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, South Korea. yunmijin@yuhs.ac.
Yonsei University · KRSeverance Hospital · KRHarvard University · US

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2011-0030086National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2016R1E1A1A01943303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis prospective study aimed to evaluate the clinical values of

methodsSeventy-three patients with surgically confirmed cerebral gliomas (19 grade II, 21 grade III, and 33 grade IV) who underwent

resultsMedian TCR was 1.20 (interquartile range [IQR], 1.14 to 1.4) in grade II, 1.65 (IQR, 1.26 to 1.79) in grade III, and 2.53 (IQR, 1.93 to 3.30) in grade IV gliomas. Significant differences in TCR were seen among the three WHO grade groups (P < 0.001). In Cox regression analysis including TCR, MTV, molecular markers, and other clinical factors, TCR was prognostic for PFS (P = 0.016) and TCR and MTV were prognostic for OS (P = 0.024 [TCR], P = 0.030 [MTV]). PFS and OS were significantly shorter in patients with a TCR ≥ 1.6 than in those with a TCR < 1.6. OS were significantly shorter in patients with a MTV ≥ 1 than in those with a TCR < 1.

conclusionsTCR on

Indexed as

Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAcetatesAdultAgedBrain NeoplasmsCarbon RadioisotopesCell DifferentiationDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18GliomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedPositron-Emission TomographyPrognosisAcetatesCarbon-11Carbon RadioisotopesFluorodeoxyglucose F18AcetateGliomaGradingPositron emission tomographyPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID29511838
OpenAlexW2791097988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.