Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29511828›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2019

Urinary sucrose and fructose to validate self-reported sugar intake in children and adolescents: results from the I.Family study.

Timm Intemann, Iris Pigeot, Stefaan De Henauw, Gabriele Eiben, Lauren Lissner, Vittorio Krogh, Katarzyna Dereń, Dénes Molnár, Luis A Moreno, Paola Russo and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. High Fructose Intake and Adipogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 8 countries.

Timm IntemannLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Achterstr. 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany. intemann@leibniz-bips.de.
Iris PigeotLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Achterstr. 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany.
Stefaan De HenauwDepartment of Public Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Gabriele EibenSection for Epidemiology and Social Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Lauren LissnerSection for Epidemiology and Social Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Vittorio KroghEpidemiology and Prevention Unit, Fondazione IRCSS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Katarzyna DereńInstitute of Nursing and Health Sciences, Medical Faculty, University of Rzeszow, Rzeszów, Poland.
Dénes MolnárDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Luis A MorenoGrowth, Exercise, Nutrition and Development (GENUD) Research Group, Universidad de Zaragoza, Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón (IA2), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Aragón (IIS Aragón) and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fisiopatología de la Nutrición y la Obesidad (CIBEROBN), Zaragoza, Spain.
Paola RussoInstitute of Food Sciences, National Research Council, Avellino, Italy.
Alfonso SianiInstitute of Food Sciences, National Research Council, Avellino, Italy.
Ivana SirangeloDepartment of Biochemistry, Biophysics and General Pathology, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Michael TornaritisResearch and Education Institute of Child Health, Strovolos, Cyprus.
Toomas VeidebaumNational Institute for Health Development, Tallinn, Estonia.
Valeria PalaEpidemiology and Prevention Unit, Fondazione IRCSS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
I.Family consortium
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITInstitute of Food Science · ITLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS · DECentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red · ESGhent University · BENational Institute for Health Development · EERzeszów University · PLUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITUniversity of Gothenburg · SEUniversity of Pecs · HUUniversity of Skövde · SE

Funding

FP7 Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, Biotechnology 266044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeExcessive consumption of free sugar increases the risk for non-communicable diseases where a proper assessment of this intake is necessary to correctly estimate its association with certain diseases. Urinary sugars have been suggested as objective biomarkers for total and free sugar intake in adults but less is known about this marker in children and adolescents. Therefore, the aim of this exploratory study is to evaluate the relative validity of self-reported intake using urinary sugars in children and adolescents.

methodsThe study was conducted in a convenience subsample of 228 participants aged 5-18 years of the I.Family study that investigates the determinants of food choices, lifestyle and health in European families. Total, free and intrinsic sugar intake (g/day) and sugar density (g/1000 kcal) were assessed using 24-h dietary recalls (24HDRs). Urinary sucrose (USUC) and urinary fructose (UFRU) were measured in morning urine samples and corrected for creatinine excretion (USUC/Cr, UFRU/Cr). Correlation coefficients, the method of triads and linear regression models were used to investigate the relationship between intake of different types of sugar and urinary sugars.

resultsThe correlation between usual sugar density calculated from multiple 24HDRs and the sum of USUC/Cr and UFRU/Cr (USUC/Cr + UFRU/Cr) was 0.38 (p < 0.001). The method of triads revealed validity coefficients for the 24HDR from 0.64 to 0.87. Linear regression models showed statistically significant positive associations between USUC/Cr + UFRU/Cr and the intake of total and free sugar.

conclusionsThese findings support the relative validity of total and free sugar intake assessed by self-reported 24HDRs in children and adolescents.

Indexed as

Diet RecordsSelf ReportAdolescentBiomarkersChildChild, PreschoolDietary SugarsDiet SurveysEuropeFemaleFructoseHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsSucroseBiomarkersDietary SugarsFructoseSucrose24-h dietary recallDietary sugarSugar biomarkerUrine sugarsValidity coefficient

Identifiers

PMID29511828
OpenAlexW2790070455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.