Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29511777›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2018

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy of prostate cancer with simultaneous integrated boost after molecular imaging with 18F-choline-PET/CT : Clinical results and quality of life.

Marsha Schlenter, Vanessa Berneking, Barabara Krenkel, Felix M Mottaghy, Thomas-Alexander Vögeli, Michael J Eble, Michael Pinkawa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Radiotherapy in nodal oligorecurrent prostate cancer.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Quality of life more than 10 years after radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer-impact of time after treatment and prescription dose.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Article
  10. Moderately HRT vs. CRT for localized prostate cancer using image-guided VMAT with SIB: evaluation of acute and late toxicities.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Impact ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marsha SchlenterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52072, Aachen, Germany.
Vanessa BernekingDepartment of Radiation Oncology, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52072, Aachen, Germany.
Barabara KrenkelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52072, Aachen, Germany.
Felix M MottaghyDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52072, Aachen, Germany.
Thomas-Alexander VögeliDepartment of Urology, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52072, Aachen, Germany.
Michael J EbleDepartment of Radiation Oncology, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52072, Aachen, Germany.
Michael PinkawaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52072, Aachen, Germany. michael.pinkawa@post.rwth-aachen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6450-297X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo analyze clinical results and quality of life of patients with localized prostate cancer after irradiation of the prostate with an 18F-choline-PET/CT-based simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in comparison to a control group without SIB.

methodsA total of 134 patients underwent intensity-modulated radiotherapy from 2007-2010. All patients received a total dose of 76 Gy with 2 Gy fractions to the prostate; 67 patients received an additional SIB of 80 Gy. The median follow-up was 65 months. Quality of life was evaluated with the EPIC (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite) questionnaire.

resultsBaseline characteristics were similar in both groups (prostate-specific antigen 11 ng/ml vs. 8 ng/ml, p = 0.20, Gleason score <6 in 36% vs. 46%, p = 0.22, with vs. without SIB). No prostate cancer-related death was observed. No significant difference of quality of life scores was found. The largest difference after 5-6 years in comparison to baseline was reported for sexual bother (mean 15 vs. 17 points with vs. without SIB). Mean urinary scores did not decrease. Bowel bother scores changes were larger in the SIB group (mean 5 vs. 2 points, dependent on SIB volume), with increased bowel problems (15 vs. 2% big/moderate problem with bowel movements, p = 0.03). However, a trend towards higher efficacy with SIB resulted (biochemical recurrence-free survival of 92% vs. 85%, p = 0.17).

conclusionsThe first long-term analysis of patients treated with SIB based on molecular imaging with 18-F-choline-PET/CT showed an excellent biochemical recurrence-free survival, but a larger percentage of bowel problems in comparison to the control group.

Indexed as

Molecular ImagingPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRadiotherapy DosageAgedAged, 80 and overCholineFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedProstatic NeoplasmsQuality of LifeRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedSurveys and QuestionnairesCholinefluoromethylcholine18F-choline-PET/CTImage-guided radiotherapyIntensity-modulated radiotherapyProstate cancerQuality of life

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.