Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29511382›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2018

Management of multiple sclerosis patients in central European countries: current needs and potential solutions.

Thomas Berger, Monika Adamczyk-Sowa, Tünde Csépány, Franz Fazekas, Tanja Hojs Fabjan, Dana Horáková, Zsolt Illes, Eleonóra Klimová, Fritz Leutmezer, Konrad Rejdak and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Consensus quality indicators for monitoring multiple sclerosis.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Thomas BergerClinical Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Monika Adamczyk-SowaDepartment of Neurology in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Tünde CsépányDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Franz FazekasDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Tanja Hojs FabjanDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
Dana HorákováDepartment of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Zsolt IllesDepartment of Neurology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Eleonóra KlimováDepartment of Neurology, University of Prešov and Teaching Hospital of JA Reiman, Prešov, Slovakia.
Fritz LeutmezerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Konrad RejdakDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Csilla RozsaDepartment of Neurology, Jahn Ferenc Dél-pesti Hospital, Budapest, Hungary.
Saša Šega JazbecDepartment of Neurology, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Jarmila SzilasiováDepartment of Neurology, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University and University Hospital L Pasteur, Košice, Slovakia.
Peter TurčániDepartment of Neurology, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Marta VachováMS Centrum Teplice, Teplice, Czech Republic.
László VécseiDepartment of Neurology and MTA-SZTE Neuroscience Research Group, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Eva HavrdováDepartment of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) experts in Europe are facing rapidly rising demands of excellence due to the increasing complexity of MS therapy and management. A central European expert board of MS experts met to identify needs and obstacles with respect to raising quality of MS care in central and Eastern European countries. There are substantial variations across countries regarding delivery of care and its cost structure, as well as access to treatment. To date, Eastern European countries are often less able to afford reimbursement of immunomodulatory agents than Western countries. Overall, approximately 40% of working-age patients are not working due to MS. Costs rise steeply with increasing disability; indirect costs constitute the bulk of the financial burden in patients with severe MS. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment is meanwhile obligatory as the diagnostic interface in the management of MS patients. Recommended measures directed at improving quality of care include the collection of patient data in registries, enhanced education of healthcare professionals, implementation of national strategies aiming at reducing regional variation, optimization of approval processes, and removal of administrative barriers. Local partnerships with authorities such as those that represent the interests of employees can contribute to leverage the importance of epidemiological data. The need for education extends to (neuro)radiologists who are responsible for reporting MRI findings in expert quality. Dissemination of the Magnetic Resonance Imaging in MS (MAGNIMS) protocol would be an important step in this context. Also, clinical freedom of choice is rated as essential. Physicians should have access to a range of treatment options due to the complexity of disease. Guidelines such as the upcoming EAN-ECTRIMS clinical practice guideline also aim at providing a basis for argumentation in negotiations with national health authorities.

Indexed as

access to treatmentburden of diseaseMS registrymultiple sclerosisquality of care

Identifiers

PMID29511382
PMCPMC5826096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.