Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29511284›Full record

ArticleNature genetics2018

The importance of cohort studies in the post-GWAS era.

Cisca Wijmenga, Alexandra Zhernakova

Abstract readHistorical Article
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Polygenic Risk and Nutrient Intake Interactions on Obesity Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Genetics of irritable bowel syndrome: shifting gear via biobank-scale studies.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Cisca WijmengaDepartment of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands. c.wijmenga@umcg.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5635-1614
Alexandra ZhernakovaDepartment of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands. a.zhernakova@umcg.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4574-0841
University Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The past decade has seen enormous success of wide-scale genetic studies in identifying genetic variants that modify individuals' predisposition to common diseases. However, the interpretation and functional understanding of these variants lag far behind. In this Perspective, we discuss opportunities for using large-scale cohort studies to investigate the downstream molecular effects of SNPs at different 'omics' data levels. We point to the pivotal role of population cohorts in establishing causality and advancing drug discovery. In particular, we focus on the breadth-versus-depth concepts of population studies, on data harmonization, and on the challenges, ethical aspects and future perspectives of cohort studies.

Indexed as

Cohort StudiesEpidemiologic Research DesignGenome-Wide Association StudyDiet SurveysFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGene-Environment InteractionGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansInfant, NewbornMaleParturition

Identifiers

PMID29511284
OpenAlexW2789858140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.