Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29511258›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

BASIS: High-performance bioinformatics platform for processing of large-scale mass spectrometry imaging data in chemically augmented histology.

Kirill Veselkov, Jonathan Sleeman, Emmanuelle Claude, Johannes P C Vissers, Dieter Galea, Anna Mroz, Ivan Laponogov, Mark Towers, Robert Tonge, Reza Mirnezami and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Spatial Lipidomic Profiling of Mouse Joint Tissue Demonstrates the Essential Role of PHOSPHO1 in Growth Plate Homeostasis.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. "What I wish I had known before starting my PhD".Analytical science advances · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Emerging Computational Methods in Mass Spectrometry Imaging.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  16. Molecular cancer research : MCR · 2021
    Article
  17. Batch Effects in MALDI Mass Spectrometry Imaging.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Kirill VeselkovComputational and Systems Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK. kirill.veselkov04@imperial.ac.uk.
Jonathan SleemanUniversity of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Center for Biomedicine and Medical Technology, Mannheim, Germany.
Emmanuelle ClaudeWaters Corporation, Wilmslow, UK.
Johannes P C VissersWaters Corporation, Wilmslow, UK.
Dieter GaleaComputational and Systems Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Anna MrozComputational and Systems Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Ivan LaponogovComputational and Systems Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Mark TowersWaters Corporation, Wilmslow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6302-219X
Robert TongeWaters Corporation, Wilmslow, UK.
Reza MirnezamiComputational and Systems Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Zoltan TakatsComputational and Systems Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Jeremy K NicholsonComputational and Systems Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
James I LangridgeWaters Corporation, Wilmslow, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mass Spectrometry Imaging (MSI) holds significant promise in augmenting digital histopathologic analysis by generating highly robust big data about the metabolic, lipidomic and proteomic molecular content of the samples. In the process, a vast quantity of unrefined data, that can amount to several hundred gigabytes per tissue section, is produced. Managing, analysing and interpreting this data is a significant challenge and represents a major barrier to the translational application of MSI. Existing data analysis solutions for MSI rely on a set of heterogeneous bioinformatics packages that are not scalable for the reproducible processing of large-scale (hundreds to thousands) biological sample sets. Here, we present a computational platform (pyBASIS) capable of optimized and scalable processing of MSI data for improved information recovery and comparative analysis across tissue specimens using machine learning and related pattern recognition approaches. The proposed solution also provides a means of seamlessly integrating experimental laboratory data with downstream bioinformatics interpretation/analyses, resulting in a truly integrated system for translational MSI.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyHistocytochemistryImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningMass SpectrometryMetabolomicsPattern Recognition, AutomatedProteomics

Identifiers

PMID29511258
PMCPMC5840264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.